Quote:
Originally Posted by majin ssj eric
So, 60 hp less and unable to tow even a Mazda Miata is MORE expensive???? Yeah, in your dreams Ford....
|
Lol...this made me laugh because this is what I thought.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Muffnbluff
Subaru does this with the Legacy, although the turbo engine there is 265hp vs 256hp for the H6.
I definitely wouldn't want a 2L turbo on a car the size of the Explorer, it'll be interesting to see how that works out for them.
|
Exactly my point. If the turbo engine was more powerful, the premium on the engine would have been justified. And in the Subaru, the turbo H4 is way quicker then the NA H6. So it's justifying it's premium
Quote:
Originally Posted by kyleb350
It should have been the 3.5L EcoBoost  It's made here in the States compared to the 2.0L made in Spain |
Hey, you read the article.
And many people believed that the 3.5 V6 Twin turbo would have been a option but alas it didn't happen. It would have been fun though and I'm sure it will come in the future.
Actually man, you know what. I'm waiting for the 3.5 V6TT to make it's debut on a Mustang. That would be awesome. And it's possible because this engine is finally going to debut in the F-150. That means Ford has made it applicable in Rear wheel drive application. I know the V8 is more fun and sounds better but the twin turbo V6 on a RWD car would be awesome. Rumor's are that it could debut as a special edition GT350 form
P.S you can still get the edge with a ecoboost. The turbo V6 is going to debut on it soon.