08-22-2007, 03:43 PM | #23 | |
Brigadier General
200
Rep 4,163
Posts |
Quote:
u have the coolest signature
__________________
'06 bsm e90 330xi : 18" VMR CSL : KW V3 : GruppeM Rep Intake : UUC/Corsa Catback : Hartge Lip : ACS Roof Spoiler
OEM CF Trunk Spoiler : CF Emblems. Pillars. Mirror. Grille : LUXER12 led plate : V1 Hardwired : OG.longtran e90post sticker! circa 2005 |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-23-2007, 01:57 PM | #24 |
Major General
592
Rep 6,563
Posts |
Attention: This will save many of you alot of headache. Introducing drobo.
Take a look:http://reviews.cnet.com/hard-drives/...-32470303.html
__________________
under construction! |
Appreciate
0
|
08-23-2007, 07:56 PM | #25 | |
Major General
3461
Rep 6,826
Posts |
Quote:
I'll keep my eye on this one |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-23-2007, 08:15 PM | #26 | |
Banned
103
Rep 1,760
Posts |
Quote:
well there you go, thats EXACTLY why your drives are failing, your using your hard drives in server applications AND USING "NORMAL HOME USER COOLING" methods... you need at LEAST a dedicated fan on your hard drives if they are being used at such high load, that SHOULD have been common sense, there is a REASON server rooms are heavily climate controlled (well thats not really why but they get away with it that way) 2 TB is a lot for a normal person yes (and by normal i meen someone who bought their PC from dell or something) i run 1.5 TB i know a ton of people who run more on their normal home desktop, i also personally have a dedicated 100CFM cooling per 2 HDDs but the point was 2 tb doesnt cost a "good chunk of change" now a days, you can get that much for about 400$ which in a PC that needs 2 tb that should be a fart in the wind in terms of cost comparison back to the main point though, if your drives are always under high load COOL THEM PROPERLY, if i were you i would even have a supplemental heatsink on them furthermore, if your often transferring data between hard drives, how many of these "failures" was hardware and how many file table corruption? what your doing is highly susceptible to both, ESPECIALLY since your apparently running RAID, raid has a higher risk for corruption and your doubling your usage for the same amount of data (what type of array are you actually running) your basically doing 3 things that kill drives 1. run them at high load w/o proper cooling; 2. erasing and rewriting data on a large scale often 3. running a raid array which is already more susceptible to corruption and then using it in a very high load (which multiplies your risk) and yes many servers run raid, but thats because they benefit from both the increased speed and data backup which cannot be sacrificed as well as using a dedicated raid controller which greatly reduces there risk of data corruption Last edited by 533ogetnom; 08-23-2007 at 08:44 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-24-2007, 04:03 AM | #27 | |
Major General
3461
Rep 6,826
Posts |
Quote:
At least you're a bit more pleasant in this post... Okay so I didn't spill ALL of my details... I have a main PC and a server (and 3 laptops and one other PC for my son). BOTH my server and PC have large cooling fans inside but I'm not using water cooled mech. in any of them. I also run raid 5 only in my external back up drive system to back up my server which is just my entertainment server for my Tivo and Sonos system In my PC I just use a larger cap. drive and use a backup software program and make daily incremental backups Chunk of change for me obviously is much different than you of course. I just meant for hard drive space, I know that I've spent quite a bit. I haven't had the need to buy over 250 GB drives at one time and I've just accumulated them over the years. The ones in my external NAS are large drives and not the ones that have failed (yet) and are SATA's I know that your #2 option is the culprit but like I said.. it was a rant and most people are not your true PC enthusiast like you are. I myself always build a new (or somewhat new) PC at least once every other year but I don't have a need for large gargantuan drives in my desktop (highest I have is 200 GB). Either way, thanks for spending the time to read my rant and provide help... you scare because you care... got it |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-24-2007, 09:21 AM | #28 | |
Major General
592
Rep 6,563
Posts |
Quote:
Yes, for that price, it come up a little short on capabilities. Maybe the next version will give you more flexibilities. It is a good products but short on a few things right now.
__________________
under construction! |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-24-2007, 10:38 AM | #29 |
The Designer
5
Rep 233
Posts |
I've built my last 3 computers and have had 2 before those. My first Hard Drive failed 2 months ago and it was a mad scramble to recover the data before it went totally. Started with some bad sectors and files not being found and then it just went totally and even locked up the rest of the computer. Luckily it was a second drive and not the main one. I do backup on a external drive but now with only two drives I need another. I guess it was time for a new one anyways, it was a 7200rpm WD1200JB EIDE.
My wish is for drives to eventually lose their moving parts, like a fast version of a thumbdrive. This will limit the problems and make them more reliable.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-24-2007, 12:02 PM | #30 | |
Major General
3461
Rep 6,826
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-28-2007, 02:57 AM | #31 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
140
Rep 1,953
Posts
Drives: 2020 X3M Competition
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
|
Quote:
Personally, at home; I have a home theatre pc with 2 x 150GB WD Raptor 10k in RAID-0 for OS and installed apps, and 4 x 500GB in RAID-5 for media archives. Highly recommend this type of setup... |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-28-2007, 05:37 AM | #32 |
Guest
0
Rep n/a
Posts
Drives:
|
speaking of external hard drives..... mine fell on the floor (carpet) a couple of months ago and ever since then, when i turn it on, it makes a weird digital noise and is no longer being read by my computer, so i just turned it off. lately, i tried turning it back on to see if i had any luck but now it wont even start.
how do hard drives work? is there a small memory chip in there or anything somehow? i lost all my stuff and only a quarter of it was backed up oh well.... lesson learned. |
Appreciate
0
|
08-28-2007, 11:02 AM | #33 | |
Banned
103
Rep 1,760
Posts |
Quote:
and the reason they use it is because they absolutely cannot risk losing their data, and they absolutely cannot live without the small gains in performance it provides (which is MUCH MUCH higher in server applications that your system drive is getting LMFAO ) the fact that you use raid 0 on your home is laughable, you most likely run your motherboards RAID controllers with that setup and have introduced much more than double your chance of failure rate, all for a 2% increase in performance at most good job on that sure your raid 5 will save you if a drive fails, but your going to get more failures then if you just had the 4 hdds independent, thats a FACT if your really an IT consultant you should have known all this already, its all well documented facts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-28-2007, 11:09 AM | #34 | |
Galactic Emperor
79
Rep 801
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-28-2007, 11:19 AM | #35 | |
Galactic Emperor
79
Rep 801
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-28-2007, 03:32 PM | #36 |
Guest
0
Rep n/a
Posts
Drives:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-28-2007, 03:48 PM | #37 |
Galactic Emperor
79
Rep 801
Posts |
It really will work depending on what the failure is and how bad it is. We use it sometimes to recover files so that we can image the drive and perform a forensic investigation. Just make sure to put the HD in a sealed baggie with as little air as possible in it. The condensation will form ice crystals and if there are too many it will ruin the drive.
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|