10-31-2016, 08:34 AM | #23 |
Brigadier General
![]() ![]() 313
Rep 4,484
Posts |
The FIA looks really stupid and indecisive. First they announce that the incident of Ves cutting the corner would be investigated "after the race" despite the obvious fact that it would directly impact who goes on the podium. This created a very dangerous situation with Ves blocking Vettel and allowing Ricardo to catch up and make one desperate attempt at a pass. I understand giving Ves a penalty. Vettel had caught up and was positioned to pass him. After running off track, Ves's own team told him to give up the position. Had he done so, Vettel would have likely finished 3rd and Ricardo would not have gotten near him in time for the finish. By not ruling immediately on the first action FIA created a dangerous situation with all three drivers feeling like there were no rules in effect.
__________________
135i, SGM, Coral, Sport Package, Auto, Premium Hifi, USB/ipod, Apex EC-7s, PPK Stage II
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-31-2016, 08:40 AM | #24 |
Driving Dog
908
Rep 1,225
Posts
Drives: 635/1815, X3M Comp
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: That somewhere over the rainbow
|
Relating to Hamilton's supposed turn 1 corner cutting.
http://www.gptoday.com/full_story/vi...rn_1_sanction/ |
Appreciate
0
|
11-01-2016, 09:26 AM | #28 |
First Lieutenant
![]() ![]() 122
Rep 361
Posts |
Vettel is the biggest cry baby in the history of F1 motorsport.
__________________
2016 Mineral White on Sakhir Orange
|
Appreciate
1
///M Power-Belgium74113.50 |
11-01-2016, 09:35 AM | #29 |
Enlisted Member
![]() 25
Rep 46
Posts |
Yes, but...I think he's justified here. Admittedly, I haven't gone back to watch replays of the last laps - but, seeing it real-time, I didn't think he was wrong for calling out Charlie. If anything, Vettel loosing third after the race shows how political F1 is...
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-01-2016, 11:13 AM | #30 |
smoke if ya got 'em
![]() 1065
Rep 2,177
Posts |
All of them are under pressure to produce. Add to that how competitive they are. Then add to that Vettel's title of 4-time world champ.
I'll say Max has some pretty big balls. More than Lewis at similar age. Lewis did a lot of dumb maneuvers in his rookie season that cost him the title. I haven't really seen that from Max yet. |
Appreciate
1
///M Power-Belgium74113.50 |
11-01-2016, 06:21 PM | #31 |
Lieutenant
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 147
Rep 525
Posts |
|
Appreciate
2
///M Power-Belgium74113.50 shay2nak1065.00 |
11-01-2016, 06:26 PM | #32 | |
General
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 74114
Rep 27,332
Posts |
Quote:
![]() Would love to see Max in a Merc... ![]()
__________________
"MAX VERSTAPPEN" IS THE 2021+2022+2023+2024 F1 WORLD CHAMPION - #UnLeashTheLion -
BPM DEV-Tune & DCT Software-Tune & Servotronic & coding ///Alpine HID Angeleyes ///Oem.exhaust mod. |
|
11-01-2016, 07:58 PM | #33 |
Enlisted Member
![]() 25
Rep 46
Posts |
|
Appreciate
1
///M Power-Belgium74113.50 |
11-04-2016, 02:32 PM | #34 |
Enlisted Member
![]() ![]() 15
Rep 42
Posts |
I don't share thisl. VET did not pass VES and as such VES did not gain an advantage. Driving an open wheeler over the grass is hardly pleasant. Both where racing for a position, so VES was in his full right to defend the 3rd place. Under the pressure of VET, he made a mistake, but squeezed his buttocks and held his speed on the grass. It would be different if VET was even an inch past VES.
That ithe FIA ruling becomes ridiculous, I agree. But for goodness sake.. its racing and if you don't have a desire to win or to finish in front of your your opponent, you have no business on the track. Otherwise, we could vote for grid positions and they go in "commuter traffic format" in 70 rounds to the checkered flag. I think that there is a shockwave going through the F1 world. All of a sudden there is a racer between them again. Horrifying..... ![]() |
11-04-2016, 09:10 PM | #35 | |
Major General
![]() ![]() 5481
Rep 7,083
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-05-2016, 05:07 PM | #36 | |
Private
![]() ![]() 68
Rep 76
Posts |
Quote:
VES locked up under pressure, but as soon as he locked up, he let off the brakes and realised that HAM had not lost anything in lap 1, so he willingly took the risk and deliberately leapt through the grass. He did not go on the grass because there was no other way of solving his "problem" Even though I think he deserved the penalty, I thoroughly dug what he was doing! anyways: I also love the fact that one guy barely past his puberty is shaking up the F1 and there are at least 4 or 5 rules altered because he is always on the edge of what is allowed..... F1 needs to be shaken up a lot more....
__________________
Currently:
M3 F80 - 30 Jahre X3 30D M sport - tuned 296Hp |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-08-2016, 04:33 PM | #37 |
Supreme Allied Commander
![]() ![]() 2063
Rep 61,781
Posts
Drives: A BBS WHORE
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: .
|
That's when Trump and Bernie comes in, build a wall.
Ok, just kidding and a bit extreme, gravel traps should provide enough obstacles and slow the driver enough. If you make a mistake, you should be penalized, not just "did not gain advantage". By not losing anything, the driver had already "gained" something. Or like in Singapore or Monza, force driver to drive on the long way around adn join at a designated exit (Singapore/Sochi), or zig-zag before re-join the racing track (Monza, Suzuka). ![]()
__________________
![]() |
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|