01-12-2010, 04:23 AM | #45 |
First Lieutenant
5
Rep 367
Posts |
The X6 is one of the ugliest BMW ever made. I hate it so much that I look away every time I see it on the road. And im not kidding.
__________________
2008 335i E92 6MT (BB Flash)
2007 335I JB+,UR Intake, 6MT (Sold) 2003 350Z Turbo (Dead) 1994 Supra TT (Sold) 1994 RX7 TT (Sold) |
Appreciate
0
|
01-12-2010, 11:10 AM | #46 |
Supreme Allied Commander
2031
Rep 61,781
Posts
Drives: A BBS WHORE
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: .
|
And wrong timing for BMW to release X6, last year when economy is fragile, and fuel price was stable at a high price. As well as the public is more aware of MPG more than AWD and HP/Torque...They dive for the overrated Prius instead
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-12-2010, 11:29 AM | #47 |
Brigadier General
120
Rep 3,325
Posts
Drives: E90 335i LCI
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Orange County, CA
|
i really like the X6, but BMW made it wrong, its not a SUV, its not a off road vehicle by any means and never was. its simple a cross over performance thing (i still dont know how to categorize that car) buts its a road car and i think its a GT SUV cross over.
its totally fair for jeremy to do this because im sure that there are a good amount of people in europe that want a car that is good in all weather. especialy snow and if the x6 cant do it people should know |
Appreciate
0
|
01-12-2010, 12:02 PM | #48 | |
Major
37
Rep 1,467
Posts |
Quote:
Notice how he said 'no locking differentials' That includes no locking center differential. Which in BMW's case is a simple transfer case, not a classic differential. Which means that the front wheels are 'limp', unless the ECU tells the transfer case to engage the front. Only the rear wheels are connected to the transmission all of the time - which is why the rear doesn't turn when he's in park. BMW's AWD implementation isn't what I would call, off-road-oriented. It's more for the basic soccer mom - afraid to drive up a shallow grade when she heard on the radio that 'there is ice out there'. -scheherazade P.S. Those hills were not that steep... I've gone up way steeper (and sloppier/wetter/slipperier) hills in a crappy 20 year old F150 4x4 with neigh bald tyres. I will agree, though, that the LR was going faster before the hill. The tyres are sandard equipment. If the car can't off-road "as-equipped", it's got no business being advertised as any 'utility' vehicle. It's an "SUV-Styled Sedan". But we all already knew this. This video only pokes fun at the concept of building a car to "do X" but to "look like Y". Which IMHO is a perfectly fine way to design a car. Give people what they want. -scheherazade |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-13-2010, 12:17 PM | #51 |
Faster in the Corners
58
Rep 1,062
Posts |
Just watched this last night. Goofy report. Clarkson tried to climb a hill & run in snow with summer performance tires.... yea, that'll work. If he put on winter tires or hell, even all season, I'm sure it'd be an entirely different story. It was designed as an on-road vehicle anyhow. And while I can't comment on the road feel, the thing scoots around corners like no other SUV/SAV and has no less room than a standard coupe.
Stupid review, not stupid car.
__________________
'91 M42 E30 - All sorts of goodies.
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|