[Lups]

To me it is funny (and I hate Disney as a company, as a childhood memory, well, you name it, I hate them for that too probably) that this is an issue. A character in a movie is gay. How about worrying about the completely distorted world view Disney movies give to our kids, especially to the girls?

[Germanauto]

My take is that kids should be left to be kids.

I didn't even know people had sex until the 6th grade, nor know what gays were until even later. Maybe I was naive, but I really enjoyed the hell out of my childhood. Let kids be innocent and enjoy life, they don't need to know about sex or anything remotely near it.

Hollywood wonders why nobody watches their movies anymore and why their strong push to get Hillary elected doesn't work. They are strongly disconnected from everyday Americans. People just want to be entertained without being lectured by high school dropouts on what they should believe.

[schoy]

Realize though that the target audience for this movie isn't just kids. In fact, I would surmise that they are marketing this movie as much to thirty-somethings as well, as the original animated movie came out 26 years ago.

[BMW F22]

Originally Posted by Lups

To me it is funny (and I hate Disney as a company, as a childhood memory, well, you name it, I hate them for that too probably) that this is an issue. A character in a movie is gay. How about worrying about the completely distorted world view Disney movies give to our kids, especially to the girls?

I agree. However, what Disney sells is happiness and fantasies, regardless of how distorted they may be. Without that, there wouldn't be a Disney.

[Lups]

Originally Posted by BMW F22

I agree. However, what Disney sells is happiness and fantasies, regardless of how distorted they may be. Without that, there wouldn't be a Disney.

Dunno, they could go full time on lobbying for childhood obesity with the rest of the evil shits who allow marketing happy meals with toys?

See, I have issues...

But to above, I am absolutely not protesting because there is a gay person in the movie. My kids have a gay uncle who plays princess games with them if needed. I can't blame Disney if they turn out to be gay, but I can't thank Disney for it either.

[BMW F22]

Was curious so I looked it up. It's Josh Gad. That dude (or dudette) is hella cool. I don't care if an actor is gay or not, I like him and all his roles.

http://m.imdb.com/name/nm1265802/med...r/rm3709465856

[Lups]

Originally Posted by BMW F22

Was curious so I looked it up. It's Josh Gad. That dude (or dudette) is hella cool. I don't care if an actor is gay or not, I like him and all his roles.

http://m.imdb.com/name/nm1265802/med...r/rm3709465856

I'm more worried if a character being gay is more of an issue than the shit they sell to our girls.

I endured frozen a while back, and I have to admit they have improved a LOT. My last contact to Disney was those fucking ice shows and of course boycotts and protests.

[Questofthetune]

Originally Posted by Lups

I'm more worried if a character being gay is more of an issue than the shit they sell to our girls.

I endured frozen a while back, and I have to admit they have improved a LOT. My last contact to Disney was those fucking ice shows and of course boycotts and protests.

Good point. Here we are all concerned with gay characters when this is just an ant on the tip of the iceberg

[Lups]

Originally Posted by Questofthetune

Good point. Here we are all concerned with gay characters when this is just an ant on the tip of the iceberg

I get it, in a way, Scandinavian women are a bit different than US women. No prince charming for me, the whole equal partnership thing kind of ruins the concept.

As a disclosure I have to admit I forgot our anniversary, again. My husband was pissed, again. I should've watched more Disney.

[Maynard]

I'm not saying Disney has any place portraying ANY sexualized relationships (I could go long on how much I hate the Disney worldview, not to mention his personal politics). If I had kids, they'd be the freaks who's parents let them watch John Waters and David Lynch before Disney.

But the idea that there isn't any stigma or discrimination against same-sex relationships is naïve, at best. There are still states where you can be fired (or denied hiring) for being in a gay relationship, and violence against same-sex couples is either continuing, or possibly on the rise since our new 'prince of tolerance' has taken the throne. The discrimination isn't as bad as it used to be, but it is far from gone. Granted, you are in Toronto, where it is probably much better than down here.

[RABAUKE]

Originally Posted by Lups

As one of the unfortunate people who have endured playing at the ice fucking shit thing, I can assure you it's all gay.

No, it's abstinence! That's a better one.

And I will sell my kids to slavery to some shoe factory if they even try to make me watch this, the original or ant fucking ice show ever even remotely reminding me of this shit.

It's not good to keep it bottled up inside, get it out. Tell us how you really feel....

[Lups]

Originally Posted by RABAUKE

It's not good to keep it bottled up inside, get it out. Tell us how you really feel....

I'll work on my language skills, thanks for the feedback!

Finns are not funny. We can't even make fun of Trump well.

[Maynard]

Sad that Finns get our political system better than our current prez - and it isn't a half bad parody - especially like the grill and stripper pole (somebody gets the 'muricans after all).

[Axius]

Finns know America better than Americans know America. Same with the Swedes and Swiss.

[TomD335xicoupe]

The movie is rated PG, Parental Guidence, not G so you have fair warning.
Married 40 years this august , two kids , four grand-kids, if anyone of them likes the trailer I'll take them. If for some reason I need to explain what is happening on the screen I will give each an age appropriate explanation. What does an 6/8/10 year old know about relationships of any kind.
When movies show kids / adults kissing their dog I have never been asked about bestiality.
I agree IF this was not a thread in the original story or any previous adaptations it certainly should not be added and Disney should NOT inject their political agenda into a movie that is obviously targeting children as their primary ticket buyers.

[enfield]

Originally Posted by Mr Tonka

Apparently some people are pissed that Disney incorporated an openly gay character in this version. ??

What about the beastiality issue?

[fecurtis]

Originally Posted by Joekerr

Nope, don't think so. Where are all the "I'm straight" celebrations? Why don't I get some of the public purse to celebrate my lifestyle? At the end of the day, its their choice, and even though I don't agree with that lifestyle, I'd fight for their right to be free from physical / emotional violence because that's wrong. But I don't really see any of that happening anymore...so why do we need to continue making such a big deal about the LGBT community?

I agree with your overall point, but why would you expect an "I'm straight" celebration? Straight people generally haven't had various rights denied to them.

[fecurtis]

Originally Posted by Lups

To me it is funny (and I hate Disney as a company, as a childhood memory, well, you name it, I hate them for that too probably) that this is an issue. A character in a movie is gay. How about worrying about the completely distorted world view Disney movies give to our kids, especially to the girls?

They've gotten better about it. Pixar's (owned by Disney) Brave centered around an independent girl and it didn't even feature a love interest.

Movies are, more and more, introducing strong female leads and strong female roles where they don't need some man in shining armor to come save them.

[Joekerr]

Originally Posted by fecurtis

I agree with your overall point, but why would you expect an "I'm straight" celebration? Straight people generally haven't had various rights denied to them.

I was being a little facetious there. I don't actually expect an "I'm straight" celebration. I just don't want to have to pay for theirs.

[fecurtis]

Originally Posted by Cattivo

Couldn't have said it better myself my 3yo daughter will NOT be watching two homos making out! Russia has banned this movie. I could care less about the LGBT community...to each their own, but I'll be damned if I got to answer awkward questions from my daughter because Disney wants a broader audience...daddy why are 2 guys kissing

Classy.

From what I've read, there's no "homos making out" in the movie and that it's subtlety hinted at that LeFou is gay. Much like Smithers in The Simpsons.

[fecurtis]

Originally Posted by Joekerr

I was being a little facetious there. I don't actually expect an "I'm straight" celebration. I just don't want to have to pay for theirs.

Gotcha.

[Lups]

Originally Posted by fecurtis

They've gotten better about it. Pixar's (owned by Disney) Brave centered around an independent girl and it didn't even feature a love interest.

Movies are, more and more, introducing strong female leads and strong female roles where they don't need some man in shining armor to come save them.

I think I said this too later on. They have. I know since even if I boycott the companys past, I'm not stupid enough to keep a firm line and not to applaud their improvements.

I can tell you that if either of my boys bring home a Disney princess from the past, I'll be in the kitchen getting very, very drunk.

No, seriously, like hangover movies drunk. No way some stupid bitches are going to invade my family, they want my sons?no. They won't be marrying seriously hot male models who are allergic to shirts? Fine, they can be straight but for them to bring a girl (or a guy) home: All they have to do is to be their equals.