05-13-2009, 09:42 PM | #23 |
Colonel
396
Rep 2,526
Posts |
Well Canon actually offers cheaper full-frame cameras. The original 5D can be found for under $1500 used, and about $2000 new, but the Nikon D700 at the moment has a $300 rebate and is cheaper than the Canon 5D2. Once that rebate ends the prices should even out.
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-13-2009, 10:21 PM | #24 |
Captain
56
Rep 816
Posts |
Nikon-Canon-Nikon-Canon-blah-blah-blah...
They both make great cameras at every level. There are some genuine differences in the lens systems, but if you can't make great pictures with either system it's not the camera's fault. For me the availability of IS tele primes and later of the 65mm MPE and f/1.4 wide angle primes made the decision easy. If I was looking for the absolute best wide zooms I'd have probably gone the other way. But I'd have never based the decision on a body. As far as the 5D2 goes: Likes - Nice viewfinder Fabulous resolution when you do everything right (but you have to be a bit more careful to do everything right) High res live view is a big improvement over previous generations. Dislikes - Shutter lag is noticeable even coming from a 20D and 450D. I've gotten used to it, but it's definitely slower. No pop-up flash. I have a whole bunch of shoe-mount flashes for various purposes, but on the trail it was nice to just have the shoe flash ready for the unexpected. Shallower DOF and wider field are great for landscapes and people, but kind of a pain for a lot of the wildlife shooting I do. Of course I knew this going in, but it is something I have to adapt to. Not that big a deal - Autofocus. Everyone whines about this, but it's fine for everything I do - as were the 20D and 450D. I'm no action shooter though. Movies. Pretty cool actually, but I just haven't felt the need to use this feature much. Battery availability. Sure it'd be nice to be able to buy a spare, but the damn thing lasts forever. I shot 600 frames using a battery-eating IS lens last week and had over 50% capacity left. With that kind of capacity running out probably isn't in the cards for me. Menus/Ergonomics. It feels and acts like a bit bulkier 20/30/40D. If you're comfortable with those you will be this. I'm pretty happy with mine.... |
Appreciate
0
|
05-13-2009, 10:31 PM | #25 | ||
Live my life 1 f/ at a time
0
Rep 50
Posts |
Quote:
---- Quote:
I'm happy with Canon but the grass is always greener on the other side. I'm used to everything canon so Nikons system would, in my mind be inferior to what i'm used to and proficient at if I were to switch. I do agree with the battery, I charge both of mine once a month and use it every day so it's getting it's use. |
||
Appreciate
0
|
05-14-2009, 01:37 AM | #26 |
Aberry is a scammer
589
Rep 5,507
Posts
Drives: SGM E92 335i, AM E90 335i
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Seattle, WA
|
primes ftw!
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-14-2009, 10:22 AM | #28 |
First Lieutenant
157
Rep 346
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|