12-07-2010, 11:12 AM | #23 |
Major General
499
Rep 6,798
Posts |
Ahh, nice lens. I played with that one and the 24-70 f/2.8 L the other day, and I like the 2.8 better. Noticeably faster lens, but unfortunately a bit heavier.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-07-2010, 11:26 AM | #24 |
Banned
663
Rep 24,685
Posts
Drives: '04 330i ZHP
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Chicago Burbs
|
it's called "the brick" for a reason.
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-07-2010, 12:08 PM | #25 |
Major General
499
Rep 6,798
Posts |
Btw, forgot to congratulate your team on the Rose bowl... you guys earned it this year. I hope you kick TCU's ass.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-07-2010, 12:23 PM | #26 |
Banned
663
Rep 24,685
Posts
Drives: '04 330i ZHP
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Chicago Burbs
|
Haha, thanks man. I do too but I'm still going to be cautious, they've been good. I just don't think they've faced many teams with a combined weight of over 1500lbs on the O line ya know? They have the skills for sure but it could end up coming down to us just being a bigger more physical team. Should be a good game though (and of course it happens the year I leave right?)
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-07-2010, 12:39 PM | #27 |
Major General
1298
Rep 7,389
Posts |
Yeah, I really think that'll be one of the best bowl games this year. I think both teams will "show up" and give us their best, since neither are regulars at the Rose.
Dave
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-07-2010, 12:45 PM | #28 |
Major General
499
Rep 6,798
Posts |
Seth, your D-line isn't slim either If you can get pressure on Dalton just by rushing four all day, he'll have problems completing all those passes to his wideouts.
Dave, I agree, there are some nice BCS matches this year. OSU v. Arkansas should be good, and same with the NC game of course.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-07-2010, 01:23 PM | #29 | |
Banned
663
Rep 24,685
Posts
Drives: '04 330i ZHP
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Chicago Burbs
|
Quote:
I know but I'm thinking we're gonna eat up so much clock running the ball they might only get 2-3 offensive series per half. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-07-2010, 01:27 PM | #30 |
Second Lieutenant
51
Rep 280
Posts |
I also came from a 1Dmk2 and held off on the 5Dmk2 for awhile. But since I switched, I've been lovin' it. The 5Dmk2's video quality is still the best in DSLR video.
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-09-2010, 10:06 PM | #32 |
Major General
1298
Rep 7,389
Posts |
That's sooo "big ten"...
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-09-2010, 10:51 PM | #33 |
Banned
663
Rep 24,685
Posts
Drives: '04 330i ZHP
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Chicago Burbs
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-09-2010, 10:52 PM | #34 |
Banned
663
Rep 24,685
Posts
Drives: '04 330i ZHP
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Chicago Burbs
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-10-2010, 02:27 AM | #35 |
I like cars
346
Rep 5,051
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-10-2010, 08:40 AM | #36 |
Major General
499
Rep 6,798
Posts |
Not in 1080p. Plus, with a simple/small firmware hack, you can get 66Mbps sustained at 24p on the 5DMKII!
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-16-2010, 12:28 AM | #37 | |
Major General
76
Rep 5,114
Posts |
Quote:
P.S. I'm running a 5D with 24-70, it's pretty much always on my camera... Some days i do miss the image stabilizer, however, the noise filtering is so well done on this camera, the IS is barely needed. And IS does sometimes have a tenancy to make a lense lose quality when turned on. (so I've been told.) I wore this combination walking around New York last week, it did get a little tiring on the neck, so I swapped to my one shoulder strap and it made a world of difference, i barely noticed the camera hanging on. I have to say though, the lens that has gotten me the most candid shots of any is my 100-400mm you can just stand a hundred feet away and still be able to see the holes on the band of someones wrist watch clearly. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-16-2010, 12:39 AM | #38 | |
Banned
663
Rep 24,685
Posts
Drives: '04 330i ZHP
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Chicago Burbs
|
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-16-2010, 12:47 AM | #39 | |
Major General
76
Rep 5,114
Posts |
Quote:
I end up at horse jumping events often, with the FF body, i find the bigger zoom just comes in more handy and leaves me with more room to play as i'm standing close to some jumps and far from others. and again, it's allowed me to catch the holes on the buckles of a jumping horse from the opposite side of a ring. don't get me wrong, I like the 70-200, but that gap between the 24-70 and 100-400 is just too small to worry about covering in my opinion on a FF camera. On a crop body (witch i had before) that gap seemed a lot wider. Mind you, the size of the 70-200 is really hard to beat for what you get. And the internal zoom is really nice to have. Some people don't like the slider zoom style of the 100-400, so make sure to test one out before buying one if you are seriously looking for one. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-16-2010, 12:50 AM | #40 |
Major General
76
Rep 5,114
Posts |
and in case you're wondering, My backpack with all my gear is ridiculously heavy
there's also a flash, a macro, and a crappy 50mm in there :P I carry copies of the receipts for when i cross the border for proof of ownership and location of purchase for all my equipment just to save myself from any hastle. |
Appreciate
0
|
12-16-2010, 07:48 AM | #41 | |
Banned
663
Rep 24,685
Posts
Drives: '04 330i ZHP
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Chicago Burbs
|
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-16-2010, 10:29 AM | #42 |
Major
79
Rep 1,217
Posts |
60 fps? Canon's website says the 7D does 8fps.
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-16-2010, 11:35 AM | #43 |
Banned
663
Rep 24,685
Posts
Drives: '04 330i ZHP
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Chicago Burbs
|
hes talking video
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-16-2010, 04:33 PM | #44 | |
is probably out riding.
6062
Rep 2,292
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
"There is no greater tyranny than that which is perpetrated under the shield of the law and in the name of justice. -Charles de Secondat"
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|