[NFIDDY5]

Originally Posted by UdubBadger

Tressle is on fuck up # 2 this time... don't forget Youngstown State where he ran out as the same kind of scandal was taking place. Bad rule or not, still a rule and he needs to be held accountable for it.

While that was on Tressel's watch, the NCAA deemed him not responsible as it was something set up by a BOOSTER and the player. It wasn't anything Tress had to do with. And the sad argument that tOSU haters neglect to accept is that he already had the job in Columbus before the investigation was done. He didn't run from it. He accepted a better job. Please don't sit there and act as if Wisconsin is squeeky clean dude. Alvarez and Ryan have both had allegations brought on to UDub bro. Its just not a huge deal cause its Wisconsin. Not tOSU, Bama, USC, etc.

[ghosthi32]

Originally Posted by NFIDDY5

Very true. But none paid them anywhere near $30,000. Nice try though. Maybe check your info before trying to act like Oregon is clean. Chip Kelly was also the coach of the owner of the "recruiting firm" that is also a football camp for these same players. Again. Maybe do a little more research before chiming in. So thank you for playing. '09 Rose Bowl was awesome BTW.

idc about 09 rose bowl. i don't go to oregon smart one. I'm not saying oregon is clean. No college football program is clean. This will make NCAA look more in to colleges using "street agents". So again nice try, thanks for playing.

Originally Posted by NFIDDY5

While that was on Tressel's watch, the NCAA deemed him not responsible as it was something set up by a BOOSTER and the player. It wasn't anything Tress had to do with. And the sad argument that tOSU haters neglect to accept is that he already had the job in Columbus before the investigation was done. He didn't run from it. He accepted a better job. Please don't sit there and act as if Wisconsin is squeeky clean dude. Alvarez and Ryan have both had allegations brought on to UDub bro. Its just not a huge deal cause its Wisconsin. Not tOSU, Bama, USC, etc.

god you are a fanboi

[NFIDDY5]

Of course I am. I don't agree with you. That makes me a fanboi. Cause I know about everything that was mentioned, which is why I spoke about it. Unlike some people...

[ghosthi32]

Originally Posted by NFIDDY5

Of course I am. I don't agree with you. That makes me a fanboi. Cause I know about everything that was mentioned, which is why I spoke about it. Unlike some people...

nope, i don't care if you agree with me or not. From your current posts and past posts, you are a fanboi. There are rational OSU fans such as chewy, mdosu and adreanj in this thread.

[adrean8j]

Originally Posted by ghosthi32

nope, i don't care if you agree with me or not. From your current posts and past posts, you are a fanboi. There rational OSU fans such as chewy and mdosu in this thread.

Heyyy....I AM rational!

[ghosthi32]

Originally Posted by adrean8j

Heyyy....I AM rational!

i knew i was forgetting someone hahaha
my bad!

[UdubBadger]

Originally Posted by NFIDDY5

While that was on Tressel's watch, the NCAA deemed him not responsible as it was something set up by a BOOSTER and the player. It wasn't anything Tress had to do with. And the sad argument that tOSU haters neglect to accept is that he already had the job in Columbus before the investigation was done. He didn't run from it. He accepted a better job. Please don't sit there and act as if Wisconsin is squeeky clean dude. Alvarez and Ryan have both had allegations brought on to UDub bro. Its just not a huge deal cause its Wisconsin. Not tOSU, Bama, USC, etc.

I am just pointing out he might not have been deemed responsible for #1, its still taken into consideration by everyone viewing this matter. He has been the target of investigations like this in the past.

I don't refute that ANY school has some shit going on but it's 1 thing to have it speculated behind closed doors and another to get caught by the NCAA in the act.

Originally Posted by NFIDDY5

Please don't sit there and act as if Wisconsin is squeeky clean dude. Alvarez and Ryan have both had allegations brought on to UDub bro. Its just not a huge deal cause its Wisconsin.

This is just all together a crap ass statement. I never sat here and acted like UW was squeeky clean. Like I said above, NO NCAA D1 school is squeeky clean... I'm not naive. Again, don't forget an allegation is not a formal charge (that was part of your argument in your statement wasn't it?), whether there wasn't enough to prove any wrong doing or the implication was that they weren't responsible for what happened, they were let go.

And quit talking out of your ass "not a huge deal cause its Wisconsin"... there is life in NCAA football outside of Columbus. Sounds to me you forgot we beat you this past year and went to the Rose Bowl.

[NFIDDY5]

I am rational. Because I pointed out other infractions and violations by other programs makes me irrational? Please. Or because I don't go with the grain as others did makes me irrational? Come on. You can't tell me that the ish Tress got into is worse than the allegations against other schools.

[NFIDDY5]

Originally Posted by UdubBadger

I am just pointing out he might not have been deemed responsible for #1, its still taken into consideration by everyone viewing this matter. He has been the target of investigations like this in the past.

I don't refute that ANY school has some shit going on but it's 1 thing to have it speculated behind closed doors and another to get caught by the NCAA in the act.



This is just all together a crap ass statement. I never sat here and acted like UW was squeeky clean. Like I said above, NO NCAA D1 school is squeeky clean... I'm not naive. Again, don't forget an allegation is not a formal charge (that was part of your argument in your statement wasn't it?), whether there wasn't enough to prove any wrong doing or the implication was that they weren't responsible for what happened, they were let go.

And quit talking out of your ass "not a huge deal cause its Wisconsin"... there is life in NCAA football outside of Columbus. Sounds to me you forgot we beat you this past year
and went to the Rose Bowl.

I don't forget that. I remember it vividly. You guys out played us. That was all. Doesn't mean that the Badgers are better. Just meant they were better that night. As for the Rose Bowl. Probably wouldn't bring that up since it was a bad loss for the B1G. But what do I know? I am not a "rational" tOSU fan. And I thought this was a smacktalk thread. Didn't know everyone wore sensative pants while posting in here.

[ghosthi32]

Originally Posted by NFIDDY5

I don't forget that. I remember it vividly. You guys out played us. That was all. Doesn't mean that the Badgers are better. Just meant they were better that night. As for the Rose Bowl. Probably wouldn't bring that up since it was a bad loss for the B1G. But what do I know? I am not a "rational" tOSU fan. And I thought this was a smacktalk thread. Didn't know everyone wore sensative pants while posting in here.

u mad?

[UdubBadger]

Originally Posted by NFIDDY5

I don't forget that. I remember it vividly. You guys out played us. That was all. Doesn't mean that the Badgers are better. Just meant they were better that night. As for the Rose Bowl. Probably wouldn't bring that up since it was a bad loss for the B1G. But what do I know? I am not a "rational" tOSU fan. And I thought this was a smacktalk thread. Didn't know everyone wore sensative pants while posting in here.

???? ok now you're contradicting yourself... I'll let you go lie down.


and while I would have love to beat TCU, we didn't so I tip my cap to the better team. One thing about football or any other sport for that matter is your ability to win in big (or little) games. You guys got out played and lost, tip your cap and move on but when you try to qualify it with "it doesn't mean the badgers are better" you sound like an idiot and as Akbar said, a fanboi.

OF COURSE IT MEANS WE ARE BETTER, WE BEAT YOU!

[ghosthi32]

akbar lol

[Chewy734]

[ideliver]

plain and simple...forfeit all of 2010 season...$500,000 fine and he should be suspended for 1 more game than the players...

I am 100% against these silly NCAA rules that keep the money out of the hands of the players...the school can sell TP's jersey for $100, but he can't barter for a cheap, ugly tat

However, rules are rules and Tressel should as a matter of routine turn all of these matters over to the compliance office...it doesn't seem that he did this that time

BTW...no one here is a larger fanboi that me

[adrean8j]

NOW there is smack talking going on!

[Chewy734]

Originally Posted by ideliver

plain and simple...forfeit all of 2010 season...$500,000 fine and he should be suspended for 1 more game than the players...

Since the NCAA never even suspended these players for the bowl game when they should've, there is no way they will ask for a forfeiture of the entire 2010 season.

That being said... I think a reasonable suspension would be equal to that of the players. If the NCAA did that, it wouldn't surprise me.

[ideliver]

Originally Posted by Chewy734

Since the NCAA never even suspended these players for the bowl game when they should've, there is no way they will ask for a forfeiture of the entire 2010 season.

That being said... I think a reasonable suspension would be equal to that of the players. If the NCAA did that, it wouldn't surprise me.

they can ask for forfeiture because the senator signed the form (as all coaches do) that all of their players are eligible...he knew (or should have known) since April that there were problems...

[Chewy734]

They could've and should've asked for immediate suspension too, not suspension for games 7 months into the future. Precedence shows they won't ask for that, imo.

[UdubBadger]

I saw we make JT get the same tattoo as TP as punishment

[bosstones]

Originally Posted by Chewy734

It's a sad month for OSU football.

Is it, though?

[ragingclue]

Originally Posted by Chewy734

I think a reasonable suspension would be equal to that of the players. If the NCAA did that, it wouldn't surprise me.

It should at the very least match that of the players.... The coach should be held to a much higher standard than the ghetto fabulous players, and therefore his punishment should be much more harsh.

But that's just my opinion. OSU can't afford to lose Tressel for more than 5 games (well, they CAN afford to, but I'd expect at least two losses if he's gone through the sixth game), but if they do, at least they'd have time to prep his sit-in before the season starts. That would be one advantage of making sure the determination of the length of his suspension is done quickly.

[ragingclue]

So it's up to five games now. I guess that's sufficient. I still think the coach should be subject to more severe punishments than the players, but equal suspensions makes a little sense too.