BMW
X1 / X2
forum
BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
BIMMERPOST Universal Forums General BMW News and Cars Discussion Report: BMW to supply Jaguar with Twin-Turbo V8s

Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      07-24-2016, 05:48 AM   #45
clar
Major
clar's Avatar
Singapore
147
Rep
1,440
Posts

Drives: M5
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Singapore

iTrader: (0)

Clearly u have not driven the new Ferrari 488 GTB. I went looking for it, but couldn't find any lag. It's country miles ahead of my M5 in Sport plus throttle setting. If Ferrari could make a turbo perform as sharply, BMW can as well if they have the will.


Quote:
Originally Posted by KGB_123_99 View Post
Not trolling bro. I am not saying that superchargers are superior in everything, they aren't. But as far as the criteria I mentioned, throttle response and exhaust sound, that is true.

Every turbo engine no matter how good suffers from some degree of turbo lag. Superchargers have no lag. The turbo robs the exhaust of sound energy. Supercharged cars sound as good as NA cars.
__________________
- Frozen Grey F10 M5 DCT
- Rosso Corsa 458 Speciale Sold
- Frozen Grey E92 M3 Sold
Appreciate 0
      07-24-2016, 08:06 AM   #46
doug_999
Brigadier General
doug_999's Avatar
2576
Rep
3,972
Posts

Drives: 2011 1M/2021 992/2023 X3
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chicago, IL

iTrader: (0)

While the sound of my 650GC may not be what the Jag has, I think it is one of the best sounding exhaust notes in any car I've ever had (hint, delicious)- including the 2011 X6 50i. Of note, that sound (in the V8 X6), was so good it was used for a sound track in video games (yea, not saying much, but still better than nothing).

and I love the comments about KGB_123_99 being a troll (especially from people that have less than 50 posts). For the record, it appears he has over 400 posts - you guys may want to look at that count before calling him a troll.

PS - Just to clarify, a top fuel dragster uses a Turbo or a Supercharger?
__________________
2011 1M, Black loaded sans sat radio
2021 911 C4S Gentian Blue, manual
2023 X3 M40i - loaded sans Park Assist
Appreciate 2
      07-24-2016, 09:21 AM   #47
shivaswrath
Brigadier General
shivaswrath's Avatar
United_States
656
Rep
4,320
Posts

Drives: 2012 335i
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Lost in NJ

iTrader: (3)

It'll probably sound better than the M5!

Those Jag sound engineers can do sound like an Amsterdam hooker can...(fill in blank).
__________________
CURRENT: 2017 RS3 (miss you guys)
SOLD: 2012 335i Mineral Gray

M Performance Exhaust/Brakes/Suspension/LSD|Bav Stage 1/AMP||ER CP/IC/DP/OC | Dinan CAI/N55 PWG BIG TURBO|BMWF30.com
Appreciate 0
      07-24-2016, 09:41 AM   #48
Mdecisive
Private First Class
Mdecisive's Avatar
Australia
211
Rep
140
Posts

Drives: 2017 F87 M2
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: sydney australia

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by BMRLVR
Quote:
Originally Posted by goj
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mdecisive
Dear jaguar..

RIP amazing sounding V8's..

Sincerely, everyone who used to love BMW M noises.
It's all in the exhaust tuning
Not true, you can tune the sound of the engine with exhaust, not change it. BMW's exhaust manifold arrangement is what is responsible for the current N63/S63 soundtrack, you can only tune the sound from there, not change it to sound like any other V8
Exactly!
__________________
1990 Nissan skyline R31 silhouette 5MT - SOLD
2006 BMW 130i 6MT E87 - SOLD
2013 BMW 135i 6MT E82 - SOLD
2009 BMW 130i 6MT E87 - SOLD
2017 BMW LBB M2 DCT F87 - Current ?
Appreciate 0
      07-24-2016, 09:42 AM   #49
SYT_Shadow
///M Powered for Life
SYT_Shadow's Avatar
11972
Rep
10,560
Posts

Drives: E90M/E92M/M4GTS/M4GT4/X5M
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Greenwich, CT

iTrader: (2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by clbmw View Post
Be nice if Jag gave BMW something like the platform in return...

While we're at it do McLaren fancy giving BM their carbon tub and PCC suspension systems in exchange for the wonderful V12 they had that propelled the F1 into the stratosphere.
What platform? The one jag has been using for centuries and manages to make a two sweater weigh 4000 lb?? No thank you
Appreciate 1
      07-24-2016, 03:27 PM   #50
ORIGIN M.
Banned
3160
Rep
9,134
Posts

Drives: ///M
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Northern Hemisphere

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by KGB_123_99
Interesting, but the move from supercharging to turbocharging is not so hot. Everyone knows supercharging is superior when it comes to throttle response, power and exhaust note.

The way BMW does their turbos is a next level thing.
Appreciate 0
      07-24-2016, 03:35 PM   #51
F32Fleet
Lieutenant General
F32Fleet's Avatar
United_States
3918
Rep
10,624
Posts

Drives: 2015 435i
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Southeastern US

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by UPSROD View Post
And now we will be reading about Jaguar rod bearing failures! lol
No kidding. It has taken over a decade for BMW to build an M engine that doesn't have rod bearing issues.
__________________
"Drive more, worry less. "

435i, MPPK, MPE, M-Sport Line
Appreciate 0
      07-24-2016, 03:36 PM   #52
clbmw
Major
643
Rep
1,491
Posts

Drives: 320d M135i
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: UK

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by SYT_Shadow
Quote:
Originally Posted by clbmw View Post
Be nice if Jag gave BMW something like the platform in return...

While we're at it do McLaren fancy giving BM their carbon tub and PCC suspension systems in exchange for the wonderful V12 they had that propelled the F1 into the stratosphere.
What platform? The one jag has been using for centuries and manages to make a two sweater weigh 4000 lb?? No thank you
Hmm I thought the F type R was less than 3650lbs but perhaps I was wrong ... On further reading it would appear it is heavier and based on an old platform. Still a great car though from what I've been told, shame BMW doesn't have anything like it with their carbon tech
Appreciate 0
      07-24-2016, 05:51 PM   #53
SYT_Shadow
///M Powered for Life
SYT_Shadow's Avatar
11972
Rep
10,560
Posts

Drives: E90M/E92M/M4GTS/M4GT4/X5M
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Greenwich, CT

iTrader: (2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by clbmw View Post
Hmm I thought the F type R was less than 3650lbs but perhaps I was wrong ... On further reading it would appear it is heavier and based on an old platform. Still a great car though from what I've been told, shame BMW doesn't have anything like it with their carbon tech
I totally agree with you that it is shameful for BMW to be employing their fancy tech to build X5s and 7 series instead of a cool roadster.
Appreciate 1
      07-24-2016, 06:04 PM   #54
F15GorDe
Well versed in the care and feeding of BMWs
F15GorDe's Avatar
United_States
261
Rep
733
Posts

Drives: F15d, F10
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: NorCal

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by SYT_Shadow
Quote:
Originally Posted by clbmw View Post
Hmm I thought the F type R was less than 3650lbs but perhaps I was wrong ... On further reading it would appear it is heavier and based on an old platform. Still a great car though from what I've been told, shame BMW doesn't have anything like it with their carbon tech
I totally agree with you that it is shameful for BMW to be employing their fancy tech to build X5s and 7 series instead of a cool roadster.
Those of us with the F15 appreciate that expertise. More of them running around for both DD & pleasure, too. You'll be surprised by what's in the pipeline.
__________________
B&O, parking assistant, executive package, 3rd row seats and the manual rear shades are the ONLY items we didn't order. Having everything else makes our F15d a NICE ride.
Appreciate 1
      07-24-2016, 06:10 PM   #55
conradb
Lieutenant
United_States
74
Rep
493
Posts

Drives: 2011 E92 M3 (ZCP/DCT/ZCV)
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: GMT -8

iTrader: (0)

Sorry to say, BMW doesn't engineer V8's well. They'd be better going with AMG.

I just found out from that video posted on the front page recently just how bad my S65 V8 was engineered - rod bearings prone to catastrophic failure at 50K mi, throttle body actuators made with PLASTIC gears that can fail at 40K mi, using 10W-60 oil @_@

Maybe they should go with LS blocks instead
Appreciate 0
      07-24-2016, 06:19 PM   #56
AbuArije5
First Lieutenant
13
Rep
355
Posts

Drives: Non
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: New York

iTrader: (1)

This is stupid
Appreciate 0
      07-24-2016, 09:52 PM   #57
Boss330
Major General
Boss330's Avatar
No_Country
1742
Rep
5,110
Posts

Drives: BMW
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Earth

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by conradb
Sorry to say, BMW doesn't engineer V8's well. They'd be better going with AMG.

I just found out from that video posted on the front page recently just how bad my S65 V8 was engineered - rod bearings prone to catastrophic failure at 50K mi, throttle body actuators made with PLASTIC gears that can fail at 40K mi, using 10W-60 oil @_@

Maybe they should go with LS blocks instead
Apparently there is a reason why we have been getting away from BMW M designed engines to BMW AG based engines for the M cars... Too many issues and to much variation in engine power from engine to engine has been claimed by people with connections as one of the reasons the S65 was the last "pure" M engine...
Appreciate 0
      07-24-2016, 10:04 PM   #58
Boss330
Major General
Boss330's Avatar
No_Country
1742
Rep
5,110
Posts

Drives: BMW
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Earth

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by BMRLVR
Quote:
Originally Posted by goj
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mdecisive
Dear jaguar..

RIP amazing sounding V8's..

Sincerely, everyone who used to love BMW M noises.
It's all in the exhaust tuning
Not true, you can tune the sound of the engine with exhaust, not change it. BMW's exhaust manifold arrangement is what is responsible for the current N63/S63 soundtrack, you can only tune the sound from there, not change it to sound like any other V8
Not entirely correct since the N63 and S63 doesn't have the same exhaust manifold design.

N63 have a traditional setup where each bank feeds one turbo each.

S63 has a cross bank setup where each turbo is fed with exhaust from two cylinders on each bank, combined in the collector the turbo mounts on.

This makes a N63 engined car sound like a normal/regular V8 with the typical V8 burble (just go to YouTube and listen to a 550i with a Meisterschaft or other exhaust). The S63 with the cross bank exhaust looses the V8 burble but gains a even pulsation of exhaust to each turbo, thereby reducing lag and improving performance.
Appreciate 0
      07-24-2016, 11:04 PM   #59
mkoesel
Moderator
United_States
7545
Rep
19,366
Posts

Drives: No BMW for now
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Canton, MI

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by BMW M3 CRT View Post
According to the source the engine is not "all new" but based on the N/S63 ... I guess lighter and less stroke!? This seems bettet than an all new V8 based on the "Baukasten" cylinder.
That doesn't make sense. You don't need the 98mm bore center for a 4L V8. They will almost certainly move to the 91mm bore center of the modular inline family. Any more is just dead weight. Lighter engines make for lighter cars and the easiest way to make an engine lighter is to shrink the block.
Appreciate 0
      07-24-2016, 11:53 PM   #60
Murph335
Major
Murph335's Avatar
United_States
145
Rep
1,423
Posts

Drives: '07 N54 e90, '10 N54 e93, TBSS
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Gilbert, AZ

iTrader: (12)

Garage List
2015 Tesla P85D  [0.00]
The supercharger was the only thing i didn't like about the Jag.

THAT EXHAUST IS INCREDIBLE!! NOW pair it with some uncorked turbo spool!! OMFG!! Thats motorsports heaven!

oh wait, just buy a '12+ 650i for sub $40k or M6.
__________________
E90 - H&R Touring - M3 Front Arms - Work Genosis GS-1 19x9+30 x10+26 225f 265r stretch - AA FMIC - AR DP - Cobb E30 Map +160rwhp/+200rwtq
E93 - Style 95 - RB Turbo - AR DP - Evolution RW FMIC - PTF E50 +242rwhp/+234rwtq
Appreciate 0
      07-25-2016, 02:15 AM   #61
Manberg
Second Lieutenant
Manberg's Avatar
United_States
89
Rep
239
Posts

Drives: 2011 e90 335i
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: SoCal

iTrader: (0)

As a Jag tech, I would love to see this.
__________________
M-Sport, 6MT, PPK, JB4 ISO + Rev.3, VRSF 7'' FMIC, VRSF Catless DP, BMS Charge Pipe, MFactory LSD, Öhlins R&T, M3 Control Arms, Rogue 6MT Bushings, Remus Exhaust, Duke Dynamics CF Diffuser, Cyba Scoops, VMR VB3 19s, BMS Clucth Stop
Appreciate 0
      07-25-2016, 03:05 AM   #62
BMW M3 CRT
Lieutenant
BMW M3 CRT's Avatar
181
Rep
464
Posts

Drives: BMW
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Germany

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by mkoesel View Post
That doesn't make sense. You don't need the 98mm bore center for a 4L V8. They will almost certainly move to the 91mm bore center of the modular inline family. Any more is just dead weight. Lighter engines make for lighter cars and the easiest way to make an engine lighter is to shrink the block.
First I was also on your way for an new BMW V8 ... based on the "Baukasten" cylinder - meens in reality 2 B48 2.0ltr.R4s put together to create an new 4.0ltr.V8.

But my source says like the normaly well informed Georg Kacher of Automobile that the new V8 would be based on / be an variant of the N/S63. Since it is clear, that the N74 - with the same cylinder layout as the N63 - will stay in the BMW Portfolio for the luxury car branch, it make also sence to base an new 4.0ltr.V8 on the N/S63 block and that could only meen to reduce the stroke to reach the 4.0 instead of reduce the bore.

For an new M5 this would be an much better / sportier engine layout than any new engine based on the B engine Family.
Appreciate 0
      07-25-2016, 04:25 AM   #63
Gunzaro
First Lieutenant
Cyprus
41
Rep
378
Posts

Drives: Speed Racer
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: In transit

iTrader: (0)

Listen to the new AMG GTR 577HP for the best sounding TT V8 . Same TT V8 as in the C63. If the new Jag FType sounds like this then that would be excellent!

Appreciate 0
      07-25-2016, 06:47 PM   #64
techwhiz
Colonel
techwhiz's Avatar
United_States
454
Rep
2,973
Posts

Drives: e90 335i Sedan - Arctic
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Bay Area, Ca

iTrader: (4)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Benvo View Post
Looks very James Bondish.. I like
Not on my shopping list but it looks incredible. Add a BMW TT V8 and I'd be all over it if I didn't have a daughter in college and another couple that will need to go.

I can't wait until they all finish so I can have some money......
__________________
Arctic Metallic\CF Splitters, Spoiler, Mirror Covers\LED Tails\LSD\Tinted\Coded\Apex Square SM10-19"\LED Angel Eyes\Gloss Black Grill\Integrated V1 & Galaxy Tab\M-Performance Brakes\Cobb Tuned\xHP Flash\Resonator Removed and -> is your friend.
Appreciate 0
      07-25-2016, 07:12 PM   #65
raysspl
Brigadier General
raysspl's Avatar
992
Rep
3,000
Posts

Drives: walking, bicycle, & bus
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: SoCal

iTrader: (0)

Excellent news
__________________
re
Appreciate 0
      07-26-2016, 04:28 PM   #66
DarkstarZero
Lieutenant Colonel
DarkstarZero's Avatar
United_States
1092
Rep
1,737
Posts

Drives: Daytona 95 M3, X7 M50, e92 M3,
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Washington DC

iTrader: (6)

Why can't we just have a NA V8?

I think the current F-Type R would be better without the supercharger.
__________________
BMW CCA Track Instructor
Join to win a M School Day at the Performance Center!
Enter Referral ID: 420186
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:45 AM.




u11
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST