07-22-2011, 12:44 PM | #24 | |
Captain
29
Rep 805
Posts
Drives: 2011 Z4 35is Melbourne Red
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Portland, OR
|
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-22-2011, 12:50 PM | #25 |
Captain
29
Rep 805
Posts
Drives: 2011 Z4 35is Melbourne Red
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Portland, OR
|
Ford GT
Ford GT40 Ford GT90 |
Appreciate
0
|
07-22-2011, 01:07 PM | #26 | |
Major General
4354
Rep 9,135
Posts |
Quote:
I'm not seeing a GT40 in that garage. All I see is a metric shit ton of similar Mustangs, some old things I don't feel like sorting out, a Fezza F430 and a Ford GT parked behind it. I don't see a 60's GT40 in these pics, am I just missing it? |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-22-2011, 01:20 PM | #27 |
Colonel
485
Rep 2,032
Posts
Drives: Red Flyer
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: 38.8977° N, 77.0366° W
|
As Red Bread said, I'm not sure what you're looking at. It's a Ford GT in all the pics (different angles), I don't see a GT40 in any of them...
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-22-2011, 02:34 PM | #28 |
Captain
29
Rep 805
Posts
Drives: 2011 Z4 35is Melbourne Red
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Portland, OR
|
My mistake. Someone commented that this was a GT40.
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-22-2011, 02:41 PM | #29 |
Major General
4354
Rep 9,135
Posts |
It is annoying that Ford wasn't able to name the modern one the GT40 (or GT44 as it was really 4 inches taller) because some idiot had trademarked the name and wanted a billion dollars to license it back to Ford.
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|