Hotel lost my Polo Shirt...(rant)

OC Guy · 06-14-2007, 09:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TMNT

Obviously, you didn't read my last setence and catch the humor.

No, but i'll consider it for the next movie if you'd like. Oh wait, I think your trying to insult me

I guess you didn't catch my humor either.

Johnny Lin · 06-14-2007, 09:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ascension

Are you related to this guy

June 6, 2007
Roy L. Pearson, who filed a $67 million lawsuit against the dry cleaning business that lost his pants, has lowered his demand. Now, he's asking for only $54 million, according to a May 30 court filing in D.C. Superior Court.

The case is still scheduled to be tried before Judge Judith Bartnoff on June 11, 2007 and June 12, 2007 beginning at 9:30am each day at the District of Columbia Superior Courthouse, courtroom 415.

Previously the cleaners had offered $12,000 to settle the case which Pearson turned down, prompting D.C. Superior Court Judge Neal Kravitz to complain that "the court has significant concerns that the plaintiff is acting in bad faith."

Back in May 2, 2005, Pearson was appointed as an administrative law judge for Washington D.C. And was scheduled to be re-appointed to the same position on May 2, 2007 for another two years, but was demoted to only doing paperwork as he is no longer hearing cases. On the same day Pearson's biography was removed from the DC Courts' homepage.

I saw this earlier too. This guy is insane. S*****

Wai328 · 06-15-2007, 02:09 AM

A customer who believes he was mistreated by a dry cleaner has dropped the pants from his suit. Roy L. Pearson, who filed a $67 million lawsuit against the dry cleaning business that lost his pants, has lowered his demand. Now, he's asking for only $54 million, according to a May 30 court filing in D.C. Superior Court.

The District of Columbia administrative law judge first sued Custom Cleaners over a pair of pants that went missing two years ago. He was seeking about $65 million under the D.C. consumer protection act and almost $2 million in common law claims.

He is now focusing his claims on signs in the shop that have since been removed. The suit alleges that the three defendants, Jin Nam Chung, Soo Chung and their son, Ki Chung, committed fraud and misled consumers with signs that claimed ``Satisfaction Guaranteed'' and ``Same Day Service.''

But Chris Manning, the Chungs' attorney, says that can only be considered fraud if the signs were misleading to a ``reasonable'' person, and no reasonable person would interpret the signs to be an unconditional promise of satisfaction.

Manning says he doesn't expect Pearson to win any compensation when the trial starts June 11.

``I'm still baffled,'' Manning says, ``unless it's simply to harass and annoy my clients.''

Because Pearson is representing himself, the litigation has cost him nothing. ``But what he's tried to do, it appears as a trial strategy, is to keep up his aggressive stance so he keeps costing the Chungs money,'' Manning says.

Pearson said in an e-mail that the focus of the case, from the start, was based on the ``false, misleading and fraudulent advertisements displayed by the Chungs.''

The Chungs, immigrants from South Korea, are now facing tens of thousands of dollars in legal fees and emotional distress, Manning says. A donation Web site the Chungs set up for help _ Custom Cleaners Defense Fund _ has barely collected enough to pay a tenth of their costs, Manning says.

In the month since Pearson's lawsuit received wide publicity, national groups as well as blog comments have expressed shock at Pearson's demands and called for his ouster. Many blog comments say this kind of suit makes the American justice system look bad.

``We're by no means surprised at the outrage because we've been outraged the whole time,'' Manning says.

This guy is just wrong.

http://www.manning-sossamon.com/pantfacts.htm
donation site
http://www.CustomCleanersDefenseFund.com

Its only a Polo shirt, go to Hong Kong to get its cheap but real if u buy it from the Polo shop.

06-15-2007, 02:09 AM	#25
Wai328 Major 144 Rep 1,142 Posts Drives: F31 Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: YVR iTrader: (1)	A customer who believes he was mistreated by a dry cleaner has dropped the pants from his suit. Roy L. Pearson, who filed a $67 million lawsuit against the dry cleaning business that lost his pants, has lowered his demand. Now, he's asking for only $54 million, according to a May 30 court filing in D.C. Superior Court. The District of Columbia administrative law judge first sued Custom Cleaners over a pair of pants that went missing two years ago. He was seeking about $65 million under the D.C. consumer protection act and almost $2 million in common law claims. He is now focusing his claims on signs in the shop that have since been removed. The suit alleges that the three defendants, Jin Nam Chung, Soo Chung and their son, Ki Chung, committed fraud and misled consumers with signs that claimed ``Satisfaction Guaranteed'' and ``Same Day Service.'' But Chris Manning, the Chungs' attorney, says that can only be considered fraud if the signs were misleading to a ``reasonable'' person, and no reasonable person would interpret the signs to be an unconditional promise of satisfaction. Manning says he doesn't expect Pearson to win any compensation when the trial starts June 11. ``I'm still baffled,'' Manning says, ``unless it's simply to harass and annoy my clients.'' Because Pearson is representing himself, the litigation has cost him nothing. ``But what he's tried to do, it appears as a trial strategy, is to keep up his aggressive stance so he keeps costing the Chungs money,'' Manning says. Pearson said in an e-mail that the focus of the case, from the start, was based on the ``false, misleading and fraudulent advertisements displayed by the Chungs.'' The Chungs, immigrants from South Korea, are now facing tens of thousands of dollars in legal fees and emotional distress, Manning says. A donation Web site the Chungs set up for help _ Custom Cleaners Defense Fund _ has barely collected enough to pay a tenth of their costs, Manning says. In the month since Pearson's lawsuit received wide publicity, national groups as well as blog comments have expressed shock at Pearson's demands and called for his ouster. Many blog comments say this kind of suit makes the American justice system look bad. ``We're by no means surprised at the outrage because we've been outraged the whole time,'' Manning says. This guy is just wrong. http://www.manning-sossamon.com/pantfacts.htm donation site http://www.CustomCleanersDefenseFund.com Its only a Polo shirt, go to Hong Kong to get its cheap but real if u buy it from the Polo shop.
	Appreciate 0 Quote