08-03-2007, 12:05 AM | #1 | |
Second Lieutenant
50
Rep 249
Posts |
E-mailed a "letter" to Bimmer Magazine
I did this in response to a comment the editor made in the "Tech Q&A" section, in response to a person who wrote in expressing concern over the repercussions of buying a pre-owned BMW and the associated costs for maintenance, parts, and concern over reliability. The editor basically said the 4 yr/50k ml maintenance program was put in place as a marketing ploy to get more consumers to buy more BMW's, as well as to save BMW NA money. He also implied that Independent BMW mechanics will no longer be able to fulfill servicing and maitenance needs when it comes to electronic diagnosis and repair. Hopefully you've gotten the gist of what was said(if not you can pick up or read Bimmer issue #69), now here's the response I e-mailed the editor:
Quote:
|
|
08-03-2007, 07:24 PM | #2 | |
Second Lieutenant
50
Rep 249
Posts |
Here's the reply I got this morning:
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-03-2007, 08:05 PM | #3 |
Lieutenant General
2158
Rep 10,176
Posts |
I don't get your point? Are you on the "off again" swing today, from your "on again" to "off again" to "on again" pendulum?
If you buy a "used BMW" and get a CPO with 100k miles of coverage. You'll have saved thousands in maintenance by the time you get there. As far as oil services go, to offset the 15k mile intervals, oil changes are cheap. If you can't afford to do 7k mile interval changes, you might want to look elsewhere (again). If you drive 15k miles a year, you'll have to 1 oil change yourself a year, which is $30. Whoop-de-fricken-do. Of course, you could bring it to a mechanic, if you're inept with the most basic of maintenance, and pay $50 per year. Again, what's the problem? The rest of things that break are all covered. However, if you are worried about 6 years from the day you purchased it when some fictitious thing goes awry, you will be driving a $10k car anyway. What do you want? I don't understand how getting YEARS of free service is looked at in a negative sense. It's like getting a free drinks at your favorite bar and complaining because one not quite filled to the brim. |
Appreciate
0
|
08-03-2007, 08:34 PM | #4 |
Enlisted Member
3
Rep 47
Posts |
You better believe I will changing my 135's oil at 500 mi then every 3000 after that. Of course I will let BMW change it free at 15k, but basic logic and years doing things the same way will keep me changing every 3000. Small price to pay for additional piece of mind. The only area I wonder about with new cars is the electronics. Once out of warranty, some random chip/ board failure could cost a pretty penny.
__________________
"The road goes on for ever and the party never ends!" - REK
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-03-2007, 08:42 PM | #5 | |
Second Lieutenant
50
Rep 249
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-03-2007, 10:19 PM | #6 |
Captain
20
Rep 722
Posts |
Thanks for sharing Deutsch. Although I don't consider it good news, it was very enlightening and does put some things regarding maintenance in perspective.
It also makes you think twice about keeping a 135i for 10 or more years. |
Appreciate
0
|
08-03-2007, 10:47 PM | #7 |
Second Lieutenant
50
Rep 249
Posts |
My position is this: As was said above, when I drive a car, I drive for keeps. Meaning I plan on driving a car to the fullest extent, for many many years, and buying from a premium make I expect the car to be rock solid from a durability standpoint. I seriously thought BMW did extensive testing and used the highest grade materials for construction, but that appears to be a misnomer. I want to drive my car knowing that it was built to stand the test of time and can go at least 250k w/ out worry. I'm disappointed to learn BMW builds it's cars to a cost instead of to the best of their ability. No doubt, they build cars that ooze quality to the eye, and are a hoot to drive, but I'm not willing to drive a car that's developed to last just 100k mls, makes sense for someone who wants to swap cars every four years, but I'm not the trendy type. Think I'll be better served by Audi/VW, and yes I'm willing to sacrifice some driving fun to get something that's more durable and built to last(something that's always been true of VWAG products).
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-03-2007, 11:00 PM | #9 |
Captain
20
Rep 722
Posts |
Or go for an older BMW that was built to last for more than 100K mi. Depending how things shake out with the 135i, I might end up resurrecting my quest for E30 325is.
I'm really not liking the throw-away economy that the world seems to be totally embracing. I understand throw-away cell phones that come free with a plan, but I don't get a high-end DVD player that last a couple of years or a car that is engineered to not last beyond 100K mi. Actually I do get it from an accounting perspective... it's about planned obsolescence and minimizing costs, but I don't like it. :mad: |
Appreciate
0
|
08-03-2007, 11:19 PM | #10 | |
Second Lieutenant
50
Rep 249
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|