[G MONEY]

Originally Posted by Sedan_Clan

He's probably the guy who, in a true SHTF moment, will be looking for a "militia" guy to protect him. The weak are the easiest prey when things get real.

Like the Uvalde cops?

[Captain Blood]

Originally Posted by pikkagtr

Why are we still engaging with capitan bloodz
It is clear his level of understanding on guns and such is below my 12 yr old nephew. I just gave him his first lesson in trigger safety and range etiquette last weekend
Just gloss over his retorts and they're nothing but feelings and troll bait

Character assassination. Well done. Sophisticated

[Captain Blood]

Originally Posted by Joe T

curious, lets just say that tomorrow the .gov finds every AR and destroys them.
When the next mass shooting happens, will they try to ban those too? and assuming that that weapon is banned, and there's another mass shooting, will that be banned?

The kids at Uvalde would be just as dead today if it was an 870 pump with 00 buck shot, hell he had over an hour, he could have used a single action black powder revolver.

Just last week Shinzo Abe was shot with a homemade zip gun, in a country where civilian gun ownership is heavily regulated.

If I recall, didn't you post the picture of the scabies that wasn't scabies?

If a weapon other than a AR 15 had been used, more of the kids would be alive today. And of course, if the police had gone in, more of them would definitely be alive. We could probably agree on that

[Captain Blood]

Originally Posted by Pablo Chacon

This sounds like the perfect weapon for "a well regulated militia." Thanks for galvanizing the need for an AR-15 and it's protection under 2A.

Of course, the fallacy is thinking it's protected by the second amendment. From 1995 to 2005, how many lawsuits were successful in bringing it back? I'll take some time to let you retort

[Captain Blood]

Originally Posted by Nuckle

I will take that over watching my neighbors house being lit on fire with them in it. You?

Does that happen often?

[Captain Blood]

Originally Posted by Sedan_Clan

He's probably the guy who, in a true SHTF moment, will be looking for a "militia" guy to protect him. The weak are the easiest prey when things get real.

The weak? Do you mean, the people you've sworn to protect?

[Captain Blood]

Originally Posted by G MONEY

Like the Uvalde cops?

I would think the elementary kids would be the weakest.

[Sedan_Clan]

Originally Posted by Captain Blood

The weak? Do you mean, the people you've sworn to protect?

Originally Posted by Captain Blood

I would think the elementary kids would be the weakest.

Trying to have a conversation with you is like dealing with a child or pre-pubescent teenager. In the context of the conversation, it is pretty obvious that it was not directed at the physically weak (….e.g….children) nor was I referring to the general population (…or my duties as a law enforcement official).

[Captain Blood]

Originally Posted by Sedan_Clan

Trying to have a conversation with you is like dealing with a child or pre-pubescent teenager. In the context of the conversation, it is pretty obvious that it was not directed at the physically weak (….e.g….children) nor was I referring to the general population (…or my duties as a law enforcement official).

But the mentally weak, like Trump followers? I can fill in the blanks for you all day.

Please tell me, after the multiplicity of massacres, why the assault weapons should not be banned? They're not protected by the Second Amendment, they're obviously dangerous, and I would think most police officers would be against them.

[Sedan_Clan]

Originally Posted by Captain Blood

But the mentally weak, like Trump followers? I can fill in the blanks for you all day.

Please tell me, after the multiplicity of massacres, why the assault weapons should not be banned? They're not protected by the Second Amendment, they're obviously dangerous, and I would think most police officers would be against them.

They are protected and no, we're not against law abiding citizens having them. After all, most of us who are into firearms were into them as civilians.

[Captain Blood]

Originally Posted by Sedan_Clan

Trying to have a conversation with you is like dealing with a child or pre-pubescent teenager. In the context of the conversation, it is pretty obvious that it was not directed at the physically weak (….e.g….children) nor was I referring to the general population (…or my duties as a law enforcement official).

So you're saying trying to have a conversation with someone you don't agree with is exhausting. What a great debater you are!

[Captain Blood]

Originally Posted by Sedan_Clan

They are protected and no, we're not against law abiding citizens having them. After all, most of us who are into firearms were into them as civilians.

So I'll ask you, since Pablo has not responded, tell me about all the successful lawsuits between 1995 and 2005 that proponents of assault rifles had……..

[Captain Blood]

Originally Posted by Sedan_Clan

They are protected and no, we're not against law abiding citizens having them. After all, most of us who are into firearms were into them as civilians.

And, as a proponent of CCL, I'm also fine with police officers and other certain personnel having access and being able to keep assault weapons. But not the general public.

[Sedan_Clan]

Originally Posted by Captain Blood

And, as a proponent of CCL, I'm also fine with police officers and other certain personnel having access and being able to keep assault weapons. But not the general public.

Good thing your opinion doesn't matter.

[Captain Blood]

Originally Posted by Sedan_Clan

Good thing your opinion doesn't matter.

Ouch.
That hurts so much. It's like the last gasp of someone who has no cogent arguments……

[Captain Blood]

Originally Posted by Sedan_Clan

Good thing your opinion doesn't matter.

In case you're confused
Cogent:

Definition of cogent

1a : appealing forcibly to the mind or reason : convincing cogent evidence. b : pertinent, relevant a cogent analysis. 2 : having power to compel or constrain cogent forces.

[Sedan_Clan]

Originally Posted by Captain Blood

In case you're confused
Cogent:

Definition of cogent

1a : appealing forcibly to the mind or reason : convincing cogent evidence. b : pertinent, relevant a cogent analysis. 2 : having power to compel or constrain cogent forces.

[img]https://media.tenor.com/images/46ce9...d37d/tenor.gif[/img]

[floridaorange]

Originally Posted by Sedan_Clan

TTrying to have a conversation with you is like dealing with a child or pre-pubescent teenager. In the context of the conversation, it is pretty obvious that it was not directed at the physically weak (….e.g….children) nor was I referring to the general population (…or my duties as a law enforcement official).

You're being trolled bro, by someone who is easily/highly triggered.

[Torgus]

Don't feed the troll!

[XutvJet]

Originally Posted by Sedan_Clan

He's probably the guy who, in a true SHTF moment, will be looking for a "militia" guy to protect him. The weak are the easiest prey when things get real.

LOL. If society is in such a collapse that militias are needed to keep people safe, then we're all dead within weeks or months no matter your personal weaponary. And who in the world would want to be protected by a militia considering their views of society, government, etc.? People in militias tend not to be the most upstanding members of society either for a number of reasons.

[XutvJet]

For you gun lovers, where do you draw the line for the types of guns citizens should have the right to own?

[Pablo Chacon]

Originally Posted by XutvJet

For you gun lovers, where do you draw the line for the types of guns citizens should have the right to own?

What does it matter? It doesn’t, just as it doesn’t matter that some oppose them. You can draw thousands of ‘lines’, but they only matter to you, others don’t care what you or I believe.