03-04-2014, 12:20 PM | #23 | |
Brigadier General
202
Rep 4,319
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
GT3 RS | Desperately seeking the next great M car...
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-04-2014, 12:27 PM | #24 |
Major General
2883
Rep 7,886
Posts |
I'm not trying to be snarky, but as an F10 M5 owner with Full Merino Leather I have to say that interior looks really cheap. As I mentioned in my other post, the Japanese haven't yet mastered some of the ergonomics, material, and luxury aspects that really make some very nice. The only JDM-ish interiors I have been impressed with, which is going to sound really strange, is Kia. I'm not talking about U.S. market Kia's though. I'm talking about Korean market Kia's. In South Korea, some of there Kia's there are on the same level as a Mercedes S Class in terms of luxuriousness. It's really weird.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-04-2014, 12:33 PM | #25 | |
Brigadier General
435
Rep 3,888
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-04-2014, 12:36 PM | #26 | |
Lieutenant General
7532
Rep 12,318
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
Current:
16 F82 M4 GTS, Black Sapphire/Black, DCT 08 E92 M3, Sparkling Graphite/Bamboo Beige, 6MT 07 E85 Z4M Roadster, Alpine White/Red, 6MT 99 E36 M3, Techno Violet/Dove Grey, 6MT |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-04-2014, 12:48 PM | #27 | |
Moderator
7526
Rep 19,368
Posts |
Quote:
First off, the GTR is now legendary and if this car performs similar (0-60 in about 3s, mid/low 7:xx Nurburgring times, etc.) with that same pedigree it is going to be a major ground shaking event in the segment. The CTS-V borrowed the ZR-1 drivetrain but didn't really perform like one (mainly because it was much heavier, which this "Q50-GTR" would likely not be in comparison to the GTR itself). In fact it was bested on tracks by the E90 M3 in some tests, despite it's giant power advantage. By contrast, there is no test where an E92 M3 comes anywhere near upsetting a GTR. Secondly, the CTS itself was still gathering a following in its second generation, and not yet considered a serious contender by the automotive enthusiast world at large. In fact, it was still in its transition from a car competing in price with the 3 Series range et. al. to, as part of a long term strategy, a car that would compete in luxury, refinement, performance, and, yes, price, with the 5 Series and the usual suspects in that class. The Q50 though (formerly G35, G37) has long established itself as a legitimate competitor against the German trio. There is almost surely a pent up demand for a high performance variant of the car to finally challenge the German AMG/M/RS trio. Now, this assumes an all-inclusive take-home TTL price for this car that does not go above $85k with options. That's the key here. Are they going to enter the market where the hot ticket is, or sit out and sell to the chosen few? |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-04-2014, 10:33 PM | #29 | |
Lieutenant
166
Rep 444
Posts |
Quote:
If you want to sacrifice performance for comfort, the M5 is your car. Personally I found the CTS-V a much more engaging albet "simpler" and more raw car which is why when I sold my GT-R I bought a CTS-V after very disappointing test drives in the M5. Not only is the M5 no longer the king of the sports sedans, it's not even in the top 5 with the Panamera, CTS-V, C63, E63, and Tesla all beating it out in terms of driver enjoyment. JUST my opinion. Last edited by basscadet; 03-04-2014 at 10:43 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-05-2014, 02:22 AM | #30 |
First Lieutenant
68
Rep 390
Posts |
I don't think an M5 is a good comparison for this vehicle (of course depending on Nissan pricing). This looks like it is targeted at the c63/RS4/M3/ISF crowd--more bent towards sport than luxury versus the M5/E63.
I hope they put in a similar AWD system from the GTR to make up for the lack of a true DCT. So many great cars coming out in the coming years! |
Appreciate
0
|
03-05-2014, 03:44 AM | #31 | |
Major
112
Rep 1,136
Posts
Drives: 991 GT3 Blue Sapphire Metallic
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Southern California
|
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-05-2014, 07:53 PM | #32 |
Captain
113
Rep 777
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-15-2014, 09:56 AM | #33 |
Major
328
Rep 1,450
Posts |
I had an 05 - G35x sedan for a few years when I lived in the North where deep snow was routine and a yearly guarantee. It was an awesome car. Sounded great stock, wonderful power, the AWD was very good and paired with a set of blizzak tires was unstoppable.
Yes it was heavy - actually good in the snow No it didn't handle like a BMW Yes traction control sucked - wore out my front pads constantly when trying to have fun in snow. It was comfy, fun, had all the bells and whistles of the time and for the money it couldn't really be beat for an AWD lux sport 4dr. I guess its easy to hate on Infinity lately but they do make a quality product, can't argue with that. |
Appreciate
0
|
10-15-2014, 03:00 PM | #34 |
Brigadier General
848
Rep 3,249
Posts |
This.
__________________
'21 /// M5 Comp - Frozen Brilliant White/Black
'18 Porsche GT3 Carrara White/Black/Red - Sold '18 /// M3 - Individual Imola/Black - Sold '15 /// M4 - YMB/SO - Sold '12 E92 ///M3 ZCP - AW/FR - Sold |
Appreciate
0
|
10-15-2014, 04:17 PM | #35 |
Major
238
Rep 1,022
Posts |
yep.. wOnt be into production. cant justify profit margin and sale volume.. infinity has been on a down hill slope sInce g37 due to lack of design change and engine advancements.. they dont have room to venture into something like this.. make some new dam engines other than VQ motors. VQ eats gas all day and lack power output by todays std.
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|