10-08-2008, 03:31 PM | #23 |
Private
43
Rep 58
Posts |
Agreed, Audi's are more pricey than BMWs for less performance, which is OK since you get the interior; but when Audi markets the RS5 as an all-out performance vehicle which still will get eaten alive on the track by a cheaper M3, they have a problem.
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-08-2008, 03:58 PM | #24 |
Lieutenant General
1250
Rep 12,446
Posts |
Don't speak too soon there bud. Who knows. Maybe the RS5 has what it takes to be the leader of the group.
__________________
Past: '08 E92 335i|ZPP|ZSP|6AT
Past: '15 Mustang GT|401A|PP|6MT Current: '20 Shelby GT350|6MT |
Appreciate
0
|
10-08-2008, 04:03 PM | #25 | |
7er
9
Rep 409
Posts
Drives: 1998 BMW 740iL
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Pikesville, MD
|
Quote:
Disagree. The cokebottle shape is what makes it. A return to when cars were designed with curves and not straight edges. I think of exotic cars that are bulged by the wheels and tight at the waist...
__________________
1998 740iL
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-08-2008, 10:13 PM | #28 |
New Member
0
Rep 5
Posts |
Those pics are a test mule of an RS5, however still very much in disguise. I'd say they've taken an S5 and fitted the RS5 engine into it for testing purposes. A way to tell this is not a true RS5 is that RS Audi's dont have twin-pipes, they use the bigger oval shape. Audi "S" models use the twin-pipes
RS5 is expected to look something like this. Rumors are suggesting: - 450hp, twin-turbo V8 - 6-speed manual or Audi dual-clutch system, with launch control - First Audi to have 50:50 weight distributrion - Retractable rear-wing at higher speeds - Expected to be 50kg lighter than an S5 |
Appreciate
0
|
10-09-2008, 12:53 PM | #29 |
Racying Dynamics
120
Rep 4,369
Posts |
Side view still looks sort of Honday to me especially the C pillar area. But rear and front looks really, really nice.
__________________
==================================================
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|