05-05-2009, 10:36 AM | #23 | |
Smiling Politely
![]() 1575
Rep 29,120
Posts |
im not suprised the new z4 is a pig....hardtop verts are little tanks.
the motor is great and can be made very very fast...but once you ruin handling and steering...its hard to fix
__________________
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-05-2009, 10:37 AM | #24 | |
Banned
153
Rep 2,014
Posts |
Quote:
I didn’t say that is wasn’t well built, it is, I agree it is fun, quick, and fast, but it isn’t very polished. You can tell that they didn’t spend E46M3 levels of dollars developing it, because it’s a niche product that will not/did not make very many sales dollars for BMW. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-05-2009, 10:41 AM | #25 | ||
Smiling Politely
![]() 1575
Rep 29,120
Posts |
Quote:
if anything it was a vast improvement over the standard z4 and i dont just mean the motor
__________________
Quote:
|
||
Appreciate
0
|
05-05-2009, 11:02 AM | #26 |
Major General
![]() ![]() ![]() 4354
Rep 9,147
Posts |
People who bemoan that the Boxster is picked over any BMW have clearly never driven a Boxster. BMW doesn't build great two seaters, they never have, they probably never will (I don't need a picture of the M1, it was built by Lamborghini and still wasn't a very special car). There's a little hope for the Z2, but I'm not holding my breath.
I do like that the Z3 and Z4 M cars were more raw than the Boxster/Cayman and generally require more skill to drive as quickly, when possible, but magazines tend to tell you which is the better car, and the Porsche's are better. The new, bigger, softer, heavier and cushier Z4 is not going to do well against a lighter, more powerful Boxster/Cayman that nearly every magazine liked more than the last M Z4's. |
Appreciate
0
|
05-05-2009, 11:22 AM | #27 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
![]() ![]() 24
Rep 1,604
Posts |
Quote:
![]() |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-05-2009, 11:24 AM | #28 |
Lieutenant Colonel
![]() ![]() 24
Rep 1,604
Posts |
They made as many as were ordered.
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-05-2009, 11:37 AM | #29 |
Captain
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 58
Rep 807
Posts |
I have driven the boxter as well. It was nice, but I could never get over the look of that car. I had the impression that the new z4 would at least trump it in terms of handling.
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-05-2009, 11:44 AM | #30 |
Banned
153
Rep 2,014
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-05-2009, 11:45 AM | #31 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
![]() 295
Rep 1,665
Posts |
Quote:
![]() If you're a driving enthusiast, the Boxster is a better choice.
__________________
![]() Current: '13 E92 M3 Euro Delivery Gone: E86 M Coupe; E30 M3, E39 M5, E36 M3 |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-05-2009, 02:18 PM | #33 |
Colonel
![]() 110
Rep 2,626
Posts |
Not surprised.
When BMW announced pricing, it was made clear they were going after the status symbol/fashion statement/hairdresser buyer, as no real enthusiast would buy a car with such terrible bang/buck.
__________________
'08 Black Saphire/Black Z4 M Coupe
RIP Gretta: Blue Water/Lemon 135i. Died to save me. -ChuckV |
Appreciate
0
|
05-09-2009, 09:34 AM | #34 |
Captain
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 58
Rep 807
Posts |
+1. I guess you are right on that one. 0.83g IS NOT acceptable...does not inspire confidence for any kind of spirited driving. That's worse than a FORD MUSTANG. This is smelling more like a show car/trophy wife car every time I get more data.
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-09-2009, 03:15 PM | #36 |
ಠ_ಠ
![]() 40
Rep 1,959
Posts |
2 Woman designed it, and I think the target audience they had in mind was middle-aged men going through a mid-life crisis. They just want to show off a little by going fast in a straight line, but want soft and smooth and comfy at the same time.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-09-2009, 08:02 PM | #37 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
![]() ![]() 44
Rep 1,756
Posts |
__________________
Originally Posted by corneredbeast
![]() An engine from a Z06 Corvette. A differential from a Vespa. Damn Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-11-2009, 11:40 PM | #38 |
Banned
656
Rep 5,945
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|