[Spec Volcanic]

Originally Posted by MuchMoore

8. Tobacco sponsorship

Originally Posted by JakeN5

2. Ban tobacco sponsorship, forever. There's no need for blood money.

Tobacco sponsorship is not the Choose of F1, Ad's for Tobacco at sporting Events is illeagle in Canada, the US and the EU.

A Tobacco's name can not be on a car in most countries F1 race in, but there is some Tobacco sponsership in F1 Scuderia Ferrari Marlboro. How ever most Companies not feel have their name on a Car in China and blackout (the Barcode all over the Ferraris) for the other race is money well spend.

But I agree with...

Originally Posted by JakeN5

2. Ban tobacco sponsorship

[Spec Volcanic]

Originally Posted by Ramos

They already have adjustable front wings in 2009 and 2010... Does not add anything to the sport or the show

Disagree
It has allow the cars to race closer together which is the first step in getting to more passing.

I would change the rule to allow the driver to adjust the wing a often as they like not just once a lap.

Originally Posted by Ramos

Are you serious? Rain races are the best by far.. even the drivers love to race in the rain, it seperates the men from the boys

Agreed

Originally Posted by Ramos

Major fail, Much better racing when everyone is using the same rubber

sort of...
I like one tire Mfg
but I'd get rid of the you must use both compond rule...
tell Brigdestone, you bring 4 types of tryes to every race.
2 types of Slick (a harder and softer)
2 types or groves rains
and say teams you get X number of slicks and X numbers for grooves, your choice how many of which type you get.

[Spec Volcanic]

Originally Posted by elciddragon

What would be interesting is if they gave everyone a minimum unfueled weight to meet without engine or gas. Then, teams would have to play around with fuel mileage vs. performance.

The Cars are weight at the end of races and Qualifing so it is basically a min weight without fuel as the cars are almost empty at the end of a race.