08-09-2017, 10:52 AM | #45 |
Banned
3160
Rep 9,134
Posts |
That and once the battery costs are low enough it will cost more to make an ICE car compared to a BEV.
|
Appreciate
2
ron_jeremy511.00 Hoiser13.50 |
08-09-2017, 12:37 PM | #46 |
Jimjamz
60
Rep 167
Posts |
It does have strengths as an approach but the biggest weakness is that you are building to the lowest common denominator across the multiple power train types. Cars that are truly 'born electric' will not be held back by vestigial design endpoints from combustion power trained vehicles.
As electric car design starts veering away from combustion heritage, pure electric designs from the likes of Tesla will venture places that multi-modal compliant designs like BMW won't be able to follow.
__________________
---------------------------------------------
2015 F80 M3 Sedan Mineral Grey/Sakhir Orange 2007 E92 335i Coupe Monaco Blue 2001 E46 330i Sedan Silver |
Appreciate
1
ron_jeremy511.00 |
08-09-2017, 03:05 PM | #47 |
Banned
673
Rep 2,214
Posts |
BMW hasn't figured out how to get the grease smudges off the windows of my last 3 335's and my e92M, not sure they have the ability to solve this conundrum either.
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-09-2017, 08:30 PM | #48 |
2006 TIME Person Of The Year
9701
Rep 6,445
Posts |
I wholeheartedly resist being "funneled" and will vote and vigorously protest against efforts to do so. The United States of America is about liberty and the freedom to pursue happiness. This core principle is lost on way too many people.
__________________
|
Appreciate
2
///M4ster Yoda4605.00 MilehighM3919.00 |
08-09-2017, 08:50 PM | #49 |
2006 TIME Person Of The Year
9701
Rep 6,445
Posts |
The Tesla fanboys are passionate, I'll give them that. One mistake I see them make is they think EVs can ramp up market penetration like the iPhone. They seem to miss that the iPhone didn't have all the relative shortcomings compared other phones at the time. You could use an iPhone just as long as other phones, and charge them the in the same manner. EVs can't run for as long of a sustained period, or refuel as quickly, or in as many places as conventional vehicles. Also- everyone *could* use an iPhone, but a vast number (the majority?) of people can't charge an EV at home even if they do want to own one.
__________________
|
Appreciate
1
MilehighM3919.00 |
08-10-2017, 06:19 AM | #51 |
Driver
465
Rep 1,002
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-10-2017, 10:39 AM | #52 | |
2006 TIME Person Of The Year
9701
Rep 6,445
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-10-2017, 11:31 AM | #53 | |
Colonel
1253
Rep 2,005
Posts |
Quote:
Come push the pedal down and hang on! (Feel free to holler "vroom, vroom" at the top of your lungs if it makes you feel better!) Ever been to a Formula-E race?
__________________
The Jiggery-Pokery is Strong with this One
https://f80.bimmerpost.com/forums/sh....php?t=1645366 https://f80.bimmerpost.com/forums/sh....php?t=1197553 https://f80.bimmerpost.com/forums/sh...4&postcount=35 |
|
Appreciate
1
nozydog465.00 |
08-10-2017, 01:25 PM | #55 | |
Moderator
7539
Rep 19,368
Posts |
Absolutely. Consider also that once dual motor (both front and rear) becomes the normal way to implement all wheel drive, there is no such thing as a FWD or RWD platform or vehicle matrix anymore. Instead you have one architecture that can do everything. This naturally leads to significant savings in design and manufacturing. Furthermore, there is no need for a driveshaft and also no transmission. That not only simplifies the unibody design but reduces mechanical complexity greatly. Plenty of other optimizations exist as well and I'm sure you had some in mind when you made your post.
That being said, I think that planning a cost effective route to electrify vehicles on existing platforms makes sense in the near term. They still have the i brand to focus on ground up EV (though no current i vehicle architectures are ICE-free - yet). Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-10-2017, 02:59 PM | #56 |
First Lieutenant
64
Rep 385
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-10-2017, 05:16 PM | #57 | |
Lieutenant
70
Rep 564
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
More power please
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-10-2017, 08:42 PM | #58 | |
Driver
465
Rep 1,002
Posts |
Quote:
And this is why 'electric only' motoring is a mighty long way off yet. I'd say we'll see ICE cars on the roads up until 2050 at least!! Last edited by nozydog; 08-10-2017 at 08:48 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-10-2017, 08:50 PM | #59 |
Driver
465
Rep 1,002
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-11-2017, 10:42 AM | #62 | |
2006 TIME Person Of The Year
9701
Rep 6,445
Posts |
Quote:
Unless we're talking about a secondary or tertiary vehicle, the entire allure of an EV is lost on me. Having to refuel every single day... Having to build in a charger at home... Having to plan long routes around charging... Decreased range (battery life) over the years of ownership... No manual transmission option... No track days... Higher purchase cost... What if I want to visit a friend for a few days? I have to coordinate some way of charging at their place? etc.. I really don't get why I'd ever want to put up with all this crap.
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
3
|
08-11-2017, 10:51 AM | #63 | ||
Banned
4605
Rep 4,263
Posts |
Quote:
|
||
Appreciate
2
Dog Face Pony Soldier9701.00 nozydog465.00 |
08-11-2017, 10:04 PM | #64 | |
Driver
465
Rep 1,002
Posts |
Quote:
And that's why motoring won't be fully electric for many decades in my opinion. Until a full charge takes ten minutes or less and then gives us a minimum range of 300-400 miles! The way I'm guessing it will happen is when the powers that be make laws forcing us to drive EVs. Our Government has already stated that the sale of new fuel powered cars will become illegal in the UK from 2040. So once all those cars still on the road at that point in time have gone to the scrap yard, maybe by 2060 then I guess that will be that... but I'll be 95 or dead by then! Last edited by nozydog; 08-12-2017 at 06:07 AM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-13-2017, 03:19 PM | #65 | ||
Lieutenant
70
Rep 564
Posts |
Quote:
if you have a garage/house then current electric cars fit in with 99.9% of daily commutes and charges overnight while you sleep. Even if you drive 200 miles per day the electric car will cost much less to fill up.
__________________
More power please
|
||
Appreciate
0
|
08-14-2017, 08:03 AM | #66 |
Lieutenant
369
Rep 454
Posts |
I think this strategy makes perfect sense. It's a win win, no matter what happens in the future.
Customers will also benefit by getting EVs that are identical to the current ICE vehicles, no strange design, no crappy Tesla interior and terrible built quality with tons of features missing. It will be a properly built BMW with the recognizable shape, a truly high quality product (not a beta phase product like some other EVs). BMW also has the power to quickly solve a problem of chargers. It is enough to make a request to all their dealers to install few quick chargers at their locations and they can cover huge areas in a matter of months. Tesla poked the bear, now they will feel the wrath of the serious car manufacturers who were ignoring them till now. |
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|