10-13-2014, 10:28 PM | #46 |
Major
228
Rep 1,064
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-15-2014, 05:57 PM | #49 |
Brigadier General
389
Rep 3,932
Posts |
wow i am disappointed in the mustangs numbers. i thought this car would be on par with the m4. guess not.... its not even that much quicker than the old one. in fact might even be slower ?
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-15-2014, 07:57 PM | #50 |
Major
352
Rep 1,326
Posts |
This has the updated 2015 GT Willow Springs lap time. Faster than the old Boss 302 Leguna Seca (different driver). More than 2 seconds faster than the M235i (same driver). There's still a number of true sports car versions of the Mustang coming up though. Sound like the "GT" is actually a true GT car and not a sports car. I'm guessing the next $60,000 Mustang Gt350/SVT/whatever will easily trounce an M3.
http://fastestlaps.com/tracks/willow...of_willow.html I think the Camaro SS won because the've had so much more time to develop the chassis. I believe it wasn't until the ZL1 and 1LE package did it handle worth a damn. The new Alpha chassis Camaro should really be interesting. Hopefully Cadillac will share what they've learned developing the ATS-V and CTS-V chassis' and make it great from day one. Last edited by CirrusSR22; 10-15-2014 at 08:08 PM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
10-15-2014, 10:15 PM | #51 |
Colonel
1309
Rep 2,785
Posts |
It does seem like they left a lot on the table for future versions down the road.
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-16-2014, 03:17 AM | #52 | |
Brigadier General
389
Rep 3,932
Posts |
Quote:
i wont touch any early mustang models ATM. i would wait to see. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-16-2014, 10:56 AM | #53 |
Captain
22
Rep 661
Posts |
I think you are spot on. I think they purposely design heavy exhausts and lower power levels so Ford Racing and their aftermarket partners can sell you performance parts. Or they can make special editions and add 30 more hp and a better suspension.
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-09-2014, 09:49 PM | #54 |
One cam is enough
138
Rep 6,801
Posts |
Right but comparing it to '10-'11+ is moot since we're talking about bolt ons making up the difference instead of a whole new engine. That 3V was a boat anchor compared to the Coyote. 2015 owners won't be in anywhere near the same boat as '10 owners.
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-11-2014, 06:09 AM | #55 | |
General
19779
Rep 19,199
Posts |
Quote:
Can you say "coilover"? Last edited by Efthreeoh; 11-11-2014 at 06:14 AM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-12-2014, 10:55 PM | #56 | |
Captain
51
Rep 776
Posts |
Quote:
It would be hard to imagine any company being that stupid again but who knows. It certainly seems likely that they'll "find" the extra 15-25 HP everyone was expecting anyway. They probably figured that they would more or less hold the line until the new Camaro is out and decide where to go from there. Setting the bar too high would just mean Chevy would meet or beat and they would have played all/most of their cards. If the next SS has 450hp it will be an easy fix to stay in the mix. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-13-2014, 09:08 AM | #57 |
One cam is enough
138
Rep 6,801
Posts |
Again, there's no way they pull anything that is comparable to the 3v->Coyote transition. The next few years will see Ford basically bolting on upgrades to unlock the power incrementally. '15 GT owners and (e.g.) '18 GT owners should be pretty close in numbers with equal mods, while the stock output creeps up to keep up with competition.
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-08-2014, 12:44 PM | #59 |
2006 TIME Person Of The Year
9712
Rep 6,445
Posts |
My 72 year old father just bought a new GT with the Performance Package option. Can't wait to take it for a spin!
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-10-2014, 01:12 PM | #61 |
Lieutenant
73
Rep 510
Posts |
Just saw a black 5.0 and I have to say, the body styling and shape look much better in person. The Camaro definitely has its work cut out for itself. Idk if I would personally ever buy one though, being spoiled by my E92.
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-10-2015, 12:59 AM | #65 | |
Brigadier General
3060
Rep 3,434
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|