[dmatre]

Originally Posted by nazali

Almost everyone has a camera the authorities have to have an explanation for the craft in our airspace .

This is slow and deliberate disclosure .

And although everyone has a XXmegapixel camera, all we get are grainy, shaky, blurry photos of a fuzzy shape…..

[dreamingat30fps]

Originally Posted by dmatre

And although everyone has a XXmegapixel camera, all we get are grainy, shaky, blurry photos of a fuzzy shape…..

I don't remember where I saw this, but maybe the aliens ARE blurry and fuzzy.

[vreihen16]

Originally Posted by dreamingat30fps

I don't remember where I saw this, but maybe the aliens ARE blurry and fuzzy.

Must be the rum talking.....

[Chappers 71]

A friend & I saw something ‘out of the ordinary’ one night back in 2010.
We were sat outside at night talking shit & looking at the stars when something silently passed overhead blacking out the stars above it as it passed. It was very big, no real idea how big but far larger than any planes that I’ve seen & it was boomerang shaped. Neither of us even thought about getting our phones out to try & take a pic & it had passed by in seconds.
I suspect it was most likely some sort of advanced military craft..but it could have been something ‘otherworldly’

A B17 flew right over my house yesterday & yet despite me hearing it coming by the time I’d got my phone out of my back pocket, opened the case, unlocked the phone & got the camera up these were the best pics I took, so it’s easy to understand why we don’t get many decent UAP pics

[F32Fleet]

Originally Posted by nazali

There seems to be a lot of UFO stuff all over the news/youtube etc.

Recent articles about whistleblowers, recently on youtube an article from channel 8...

Seems UFO's or UPO's ? Are really surging, is it just a diversionary tactic to get peoples attention from other important world events or are world events being influenced bu UPO's

No one has taken credible video, but if they had would it be allowed to be aired ?

Government accused of having UFO tech, reverse engineering, even dead pilots.

I remember ages ago I thought I read an article that Obama was going to blow the lid on UFO's when he left office LOL

A lot of stuff coming out from the Mar's lander, looks like mars was habitable milenia ago

My thoughts have always been this. Alien's exist, other life does exist for sure. BUt this is the question

* would they come here / could they
* any species capable of this would look on us like mice, would we be even worth bothering with
* As a species are we too dangerous to even to get to know
* As a world we are so dis united,and hell bent on killing each other, were not ready

I think and this has been out there.

Though people think they want to know about aliens, if it ever got broadcast, "yes we found life" I mean even mice, or even a fossil of a mice, I believe it would throw the whole world into panic.

Believes, religion, would be topped on its head, I think the governments know this and are too scared about the panic that would ensue.

I've read and also believe that the best way and I think what they are doing, is gradually [...]

You don't think footage from the US Navy is credible?

[F32Fleet]

There's a lot of talking that the MIC has been for decades trying to reverse engineer alien technology. The financial and military implications are very high.

[dmatre]

Originally Posted by F32Fleet

You don't think footage from the US Navy is credible?

The footage is credible in that it shows SOMETHING.

Whether that something is alien or not is still subject to scrutiny.

As was stated earlier, in the past how many people saw F117s, B2s, and other experimental aircraft, and reported seeing spaceships? You don’t think our aircraft R&D stopped in the 60’s do you?

[F32Fleet]

Originally Posted by dmatre

The footage is credible in that it shows SOMETHING.

Whether that something is alien or not is still subject to scrutiny.

As was stated earlier, in the past how many people saw F117s, B2s, and other experimental aircraft, and reported seeing spaceships? You don’t think our aircraft R&D stopped in the 60’s do you?

it's not really subject to scrutiny. It's not a SW issue and the same vessels were seen in the Czechoslovakia '87.

The movement of Tic Tac defies physics as we know it.

[Bingham]

Originally Posted by dmatre

The footage is credible in that it shows SOMETHING.

Whether that something is alien or not is still subject to scrutiny.

As was stated earlier, in the past how many people saw F117s, B2s, and other experimental aircraft, and reported seeing spaceships? You don’t think our aircraft R&D stopped in the 60’s do you?

Feel like we have a right to know.

Nat’l sec. yeah yeah.

[dmatre]

Originally Posted by Bingham_M2C

Feel like we have a right to know.

Nat’l sec. yeah yeah.

And why would that be?
Rights are clearly spelled out in the Constitution. Never saw ‘right to know’ anywhere.

[nazali]

lovely pics ! I did something similar
at school (I was 10 at the time) we did an experiment I built a hot air balloon, oh a small one about the size of a football.
whole class went out teacher had a tin can with a tea candle to inflate the balloon, I stood back proudly to take a picture on my camera (WITH FILM IN IT) as the balloon inflated and started to risk, I clicked a picture and then for some reason it caught fire and went up, came down in a firey mess

when the picture developed only one pic came out it showed a blurry blob going up and no fire

now UAP's are flying a silly speeds so yes, BLURRY PIXELS

Originally Posted by Chappers 71

A B17 flew right over my house yesterday & yet despite me hearing it coming by the time I’d got my phone out of my back pocket, opened the case, unlocked the phone & got the camera up these were the best pics I took, so it’s easy to understand why we don’t get many decent UAP pics

[nazali]

I'm sorry sir, as a Canadian (ok British but Canadian PR) I make it my mission to know about you Americans and your laws, a quick google with a screenshot
shows you do have a right to know !

Originally Posted by dmatre

And why would that be?
Rights are clearly spelled out in the Constitution. Never saw ‘right to know’ anywhere.

[dmatre]

Sorry, you have a right to speak your mind, to your religion , and the media has the right to report what it knows. Nowhere does it say that the government must tell you everything it knows.

[F32Fleet]

Anyone listen to the testimony today?

Subcommittee on National Security, the Border, an…:

[infinitekidM2C]

The withholding of information is very troubling because it's done very covertly and even people within the government who have the highest access are not able to obtain the information. There are apparently subgroups within the government who have taken it upon themselves to decide who can and cannot access this info which violates the Constitution and the balance of powers. I think at this point they will have to back off their position very soon. They would claim its a matter of "national security" but the question is how?

Cat's almost out the bag

[infinitekidM2C]

Originally Posted by dmatre

Sorry, you have a right to speak your mind, to your religion , and the media has the right to report what it knows. Nowhere does it say that the government must tell you everything it knows.

Well the government only has the power that is provided via the constitution and amendments etc. Unlike american citizens who can do whatever they want UNLESS there is a restriction based on law.

[Lady Jane]

After reading some of the posts and media stories, all I'll say is if they come for me, it won't be an abduction but a rescue.

[infinitekidM2C]

The most likely person to be an undercover alien in this thread is Nazali. EIther that or she's done too much drugs.

[Car-Addicted]

Show me the bodies or it's just a typical government misdirection. What 40 million dollar grift, look at the UFO.

[BIGW0RM]

Originally Posted by Car-Addicted

Show me the bodies or it's just a typical government misdirection. What 40 million dollar grift, look at the UFO.

Agreed.

[F32Fleet]

Originally Posted by infinitekidM2C

The withholding of information is very troubling because it's done very covertly and even people within the government who have the highest access are not able to obtain the information. There are apparently subgroups within the government who have taken it upon themselves to decide who can and cannot access this info which violates the Constitution and the balance of powers. I think at this point they will have to back off their position very soon. They would claim its a matter of "national security" but the question is how?

Cat's almost out the bag

Ya. This particular disclosure this morning is huge. Might as well just call it disclosure.

[///MPhatic]

Originally Posted by infinitekidM2C

They would claim its a matter of "national security" but the question is how?

There are people that know vastly more than the average person knows, and to be honest, we must trust that those people have our best interests at heart because we will never have the whole story anyway.

My thing is, giving any one of us the WHOLE story, we would probably make the very same decisions they are making, we just (as normal people with no access) don't understand those decisions because we don't have all the information.