[JY01]

Looks pretty good but the rear looks like a CRV

[MontyB1]

Originally Posted by Faris Ahmed

Adaptive m suspension standard
Iam in

Slow down on that it’s mechanical not actual normal adaptive. They haven’t fitted adaptive to the X1 despite the name being the same.

[tex2670]

Originally Posted by bcjbmwm3

The quad exhaust is interesting, I thought that was just a m car thing.

you could see those in the spy shots of the test mules

[N54B30A]

How did BMW somehow manage to match the 0-60 of the e84, a 10+ year old design? This thing needs a diet, even with a 4 cyl its almost 1000lbs heavier than the e84 35i. What an absolute joke, I can't think of many other bmw's that matched the performance of the same model 10+ years ago.

[kamilbaran]

Excited to see how far they push this 4 cyl. (KEEP IS AWAY FROM THE TRUE Ms THOUGH)

[j2dad5389]

Originally Posted by Goettler_Boost

E30?

I’m talking in the modern turbo charged era. The E30 is a rare example

[tex2670]

Originally Posted by JY01

Looks pretty good but the rear looks like a CRV

[N54B30A]

Originally Posted by Goettler_Boost

E30?

The E30 M3 may have been the worst selling M car of all time in the US. S14 is a decent motor but nowhere near the euro or even US s50/52s, the 54s, etc. Keep 4 cylinders away from M cars.

[Macphisto]

When an X1 looks better than an XM.

[tex2670]

Originally Posted by j2dad5389

-back to the 35i nameplate? Thought we ditched this with the introduction of the b58 and x40i

No, not on the FWD platforms. X1, X2, 2-Series GC all have been using 35i for years, and still do.

[Ftpohyeah]

Nice car, the interior aint bad at all.
Interesting design on the mirror haha

[tex2670]

Originally Posted by N54B30A

The E30 M3 may have been the worst selling M car of all time in the US. S14 is a decent motor but nowhere near the euro or even US s50/52s, the 54s, etc. Keep 4 cylinders away from M cars.

Well since this isn't an "M" car, what's it matter anyway?

[Chonkapotamus]

Front end looks better than the LCI X5's. They're going to sell a ton of these.

[IcEWoLF]

Not a bad looking car and it packs a punch. It says 0-60 in 5.2 seconds. That thing is definitely going to be doing it under 5 seconds knowing how conservative bmw is with their numbers.

The pricing is also solid.

[JupiterOne]

Again DCT, WTF?

[TheBingoBalls]

Not sure how anyone can be bearish on this thing. This is arguably “classic” BMW in all the best ways. The base X1 was already a very fun car to drive (bigger but more refined MINI), up the HP to over 300, a lot of smiles this thing will give.

Well done BMW.

[JupiterOne]

[JupiterOne]

Originally Posted by JupiterOne

Again DCT, WTF?

However at least we could hope they more focus now on improving firmware for existing models.

[Blue87]

It looks great! High weight and slowish acceleration numbers make it less attractive...also, seems like universal garage remote should just come standard on a premium vehicle. I see plenty of X1 and x3s driving around my area, so what do I know?

[sitcom323]

Honestly, I'm kinda digging this. Tight, sober styling, great wheels, good tech and a really nice price. This will sell.

[LuckyBrand]

Originally Posted by Macphisto

When an X1 looks better than an XM.

When an X1 looks better than a lot of the current bimmers.

[///M TOWN]

Originally Posted by JY01

Looks pretty good but the rear looks like a CRV

I see a G87 rear bumper that’s for sure