E90Post
 


TNT Racewerks
 
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum > E90 / E92 / E93 3-series Powertrain and Drivetrain Discussions > N54 Turbo Engine / Drivetrain / Exhaust Modifications - 335i > 2nd Dyno - Procede V2 only



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      02-06-2008, 11:14 PM   #1
boosted305
Private First Class
7
Rep
115
Posts

Drives: 335i Coupe
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: South Florida

iTrader: (0)

2nd Dyno - Procede V2 only

Ok, so I installed the V2 last Friday. My car has no other mods and, in fact, still has the temp tag on it.

The install was very simple and straightforward.

The car felt pretty good right afterward, but got stronger as the days went by due to the adaptation process.

There was one series of full throttles that concerned me: 3 times I floored it and in 3rd gear at 5500 the car hit a fuel cut or something...no limp mode...just a cut of some sort, and then back to normal.

thankfully the next day it was gone!

So far, I am very pleased. The car really woke up! It feels like it is chomping at the bit all the time....very responsive and just wants to go!

I decided to dyno again (did a baseline last week)to see exactly what the V2 gave me.

I was very pleased with the results: I gained 62 RWHP from the V2 alone! I was hoping for 50 or so...so I was happy.
What was so pleasing was that this was with the 90% default torque settings which Ali at Vishnu told me were designed for 91 octane cars in Cali. He told me I should be able to take it to 92% with no problem. So I think that'll definitely be worth a few more ponies!

If I can get 8 RWHP or so from bumping the torque settings, 15 from an exhaust, and 10 from a filter...that would bring me to around 370RWHP...does that sound reasonable to you guys? Anyone with knowledge let me know how much I can expect to gain from the torque settings?

I printed out only my best runs from the baseline and V2 dynos for comparison.


So far so good!
Attached Images
 
Appreciate 0
      02-06-2008, 11:15 PM   #2
A418t81
Lieutenant Colonel
318
Rep
1,517
Posts

Drives: Ever changing fleet
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Alabama

iTrader: (1)

Garage List
2013 335is  [0.00]
Your dyno operator needs to learn a thing or two about dynoing cars, especially ones with tq...but cool post.
__________________
23 iX M60, 24 GT3 RS Weissach, 22 Rivian R1T, 23 RS3, 13 E92 M3 Competition: Akra Evo, KW V3, etc
Appreciate 0
      02-06-2008, 11:27 PM   #3
v2bling
First Lieutenant
v2bling's Avatar
7
Rep
301
Posts

Drives: speed demon
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Mansfield,tx

iTrader: (0)

Whats the correct method of dynoing then? I know its 4th gear traction control off.. What else? Thanks

Nice numbers for 91 octane
__________________
535i -
Black Sapphire/Black Dakota/Bamboo/AnthraciteHeadliner/M-Tech Kit/Spoiler/Sports/Premium/Navi/HUD/Comfort/Rear Shades/ParkDistance/Ipod/Sports Auto w/Paddle/Logik7/30% Tint/Clear Bra/KW3/ Radenergie rs10 20"/Defi RedRacer Psi/Smoked front reflectors/ LED interior lights

Soon: Rpi Catback, GIAC or EVOtech flash, Dinan Rear Strut, OEM M5 Mirrors
Appreciate 0
      02-06-2008, 11:32 PM   #4
ontopofm
Lieutenant Colonel
76
Rep
1,548
Posts

Drives: stock
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: CA

iTrader: (4)

wow, 337 rwhp with just V2. how come i only got 315?
Appreciate 0
      02-06-2008, 11:36 PM   #5
O-cha
Brigadier General
O-cha's Avatar
218
Rep
4,726
Posts

Drives: Mcoupe
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: In front of you

iTrader: (2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by ontopofm View Post
wow, 337 rwhp with just V2. how come i only got 315?
V1 cars made that much. I'm pretty disappointed in the V2 numbers.
__________________
Appreciate 0
      02-06-2008, 11:36 PM   #6
E90ice
Banned
E90ice's Avatar
205
Rep
2,002
Posts

Drives: 2008 335xi Coupe
Join Date: May 2006
Location: WA

iTrader: (0)

You won't gaint 15whp from an exhaust and you are lucky to get 5whp with a filter.

Next best thing you can do it catless DP's. Thats what really transforms your car.
__________________
Appreciate 0
      02-07-2008, 12:11 AM   #7
335iheLLraiseR
اوليسيس
335iheLLraiseR's Avatar
United_States
198
Rep
4,678
Posts

Drives: e92 335
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: sfl

iTrader: (8)

Garage List
2007 e92 335  [10.00]
that Dyno is off.

OP, PM me when you get a chance.

edit:
the dyno is off but thats not whats wrong. you had a baseline dyno done on 1/30, you need to let it adapt some more.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by lawdude View Post
Anyone who can transition seamlessly from defending one vendor and bashing another vendor to bashing the one he formally defended and defending the one he formally bashed has a instant credibility problem.
<---Sign up Now for Bonus Storage! Up to 10gb!
Appreciate 0
      02-07-2008, 12:17 AM   #8
OpenFlash
United_States
1750
Rep
17,960
Posts

Drives: A Lot
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: SF Bay, CA

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by boosted305 View Post
Ok, so I installed the V2 last Friday. My car has no other mods and, in fact, still has the temp tag on it.

The install was very simple and straightforward.

The car felt pretty good right afterward, but got stronger as the days went by due to the adaptation process.

There was one series of full throttles that concerned me: 3 times I floored it and in 3rd gear at 5500 the car hit a fuel cut or something...no limp mode...just a cut of some sort, and then back to normal.

thankfully the next day it was gone!

So far, I am very pleased. The car really woke up! It feels like it is chomping at the bit all the time....very responsive and just wants to go!

I decided to dyno again (did a baseline last week)to see exactly what the V2 gave me.

I was very pleased with the results: I gained 62 RWHP from the V2 alone! I was hoping for 50 or so...so I was happy.
What was so pleasing was that this was with the 90% default torque settings which Ali at Vishnu told me were designed for 91 octane cars in Cali. He told me I should be able to take it to 92% with no problem. So I think that'll definitely be worth a few more ponies!

If I can get 8 RWHP or so from bumping the torque settings, 15 from an exhaust, and 10 from a filter...that would bring me to around 370RWHP...does that sound reasonable to you guys? Anyone with knowledge let me know how much I can expect to gain from the torque settings?

I printed out only my best runs from the baseline and V2 dynos for comparison.


So far so good!
Looks good. Dyno is reading fine. But the operator needs to start the run at 2000rpm, not 4000rpm. You missed out on the big torque number (which happens at 3000-35000rpm!) At 94%, running 93oct, you'll pick up another 10-20whp too

Cheers,
shiv
Appreciate 0
      02-07-2008, 12:20 AM   #9
335iheLLraiseR
اوليسيس
335iheLLraiseR's Avatar
United_States
198
Rep
4,678
Posts

Drives: e92 335
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: sfl

iTrader: (8)

Garage List
2007 e92 335  [10.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by shiv@vishnu View Post
Looks good. Dyno is reading fine. But the operator needs to start the run at 2000rpm, not 4000rpm. You missed out on the big torque number (which happens at 3000-35000rpm!) At 94%, running 93oct, you'll pick up another 10-20whp too

Cheers,
shiv
reading fine? i got 326rwhp from that exact same dyno on 1.47.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by lawdude View Post
Anyone who can transition seamlessly from defending one vendor and bashing another vendor to bashing the one he formally defended and defending the one he formally bashed has a instant credibility problem.
<---Sign up Now for Bonus Storage! Up to 10gb!
Appreciate 0
      02-07-2008, 12:23 AM   #10
O-cha
Brigadier General
O-cha's Avatar
218
Rep
4,726
Posts

Drives: Mcoupe
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: In front of you

iTrader: (2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by 335iheLLraiseR View Post
reading fine? i got 326rwhp from that exact same dyno on 1.47.
What's your point?
__________________
Appreciate 0
      02-07-2008, 12:34 AM   #11
335iheLLraiseR
اوليسيس
335iheLLraiseR's Avatar
United_States
198
Rep
4,678
Posts

Drives: e92 335
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: sfl

iTrader: (8)

Garage List
2007 e92 335  [10.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by O-cha View Post
What's your point?
are you being sarcastic or insinuating something?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by lawdude View Post
Anyone who can transition seamlessly from defending one vendor and bashing another vendor to bashing the one he formally defended and defending the one he formally bashed has a instant credibility problem.
<---Sign up Now for Bonus Storage! Up to 10gb!
Appreciate 0
      02-07-2008, 12:39 AM   #12
O-cha
Brigadier General
O-cha's Avatar
218
Rep
4,726
Posts

Drives: Mcoupe
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: In front of you

iTrader: (2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by 335iheLLraiseR View Post
are you being sarcastic or insinuating something?
Neither. If my assumption is correct that you believe the dyno is reading wrong because he only has a 10hp gain over V1. Then I'm asking what's your point.

Not insinuating that V2 has hardly any gains over V1, I came right out and said that I was disappointed with them. So far I haven't seen any customers come out with any impressive gains. Mines going in next weekend so I'll see too.
__________________
Appreciate 0
      02-07-2008, 12:58 AM   #13
OpenFlash
United_States
1750
Rep
17,960
Posts

Drives: A Lot
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: SF Bay, CA

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by 335iheLLraiseR View Post
reading fine? i got 326rwhp from that exact same dyno on 1.47.
He's running v2 at 90% which means that peak hp is only 10-15whp higher than v1.47 (of course the power differential at high rpm is bigger). Adjusting the user tq settings, depending on octane, can easily be worth another 20whp. Sometimes more. In Mr 5's car, for instance, it was worth 35whp on 91oct. Also, he posted SAE corrected numbers. Both uncorrected and STD would be higher.

Shiv
Appreciate 0
      02-07-2008, 02:13 AM   #14
335iheLLraiseR
اوليسيس
335iheLLraiseR's Avatar
United_States
198
Rep
4,678
Posts

Drives: e92 335
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: sfl

iTrader: (8)

Garage List
2007 e92 335  [10.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by shiv@vishnu View Post
He's running v2 at 90% which means that peak hp is only 10-15whp higher than v1.47 (of course the power differential at high rpm is bigger). Adjusting the user tq settings, depending on octane, can easily be worth another 20whp. Sometimes more. In Mr 5's car, for instance, it was worth 35whp on 91oct. Also, he posted SAE corrected numbers. Both uncorrected and STD would be higher.

Shiv
thank you.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by lawdude View Post
Anyone who can transition seamlessly from defending one vendor and bashing another vendor to bashing the one he formally defended and defending the one he formally bashed has a instant credibility problem.
<---Sign up Now for Bonus Storage! Up to 10gb!
Appreciate 0
      02-07-2008, 05:58 AM   #15
Lane
Several N54 cars, V1,3, V2.0.2, and V3.1
12
Rep
778
Posts

Drives: N54s
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: UK DE GR SW

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by shiv@vishnu View Post
He's running v2 at 90% which means that peak hp is only 10-15whp higher than v1.47 (of course the power differential at high rpm is bigger). Adjusting the user tq settings, depending on octane, can easily be worth another 20whp. Sometimes more. In Mr 5's car, for instance, it was worth 35whp on 91oct. Also, he posted SAE corrected numbers. Both uncorrected and STD would be higher.

Shiv
I don't know if you are right here. Mr. 5 posted the 35whp was because of the custom tune. Not because of changing the settings. Perhaps he just did not tell about changing the settings, since the graphs indicate clearly more boost indicating the settings to have been changed. How much can you change the settings up running 91oct? Did you increase it to 92% or more? What was the effect of changing the settings and how much of the gain is from the custom tune?
Appreciate 0
      02-07-2008, 06:06 AM   #16
Driver72
Brigadier General
330
Rep
4,484
Posts

Drives: 335i - to new owners now.
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: California

iTrader: (0)

Looks pretty good to me.
337 rwhp on 90% default settings with dyno set to SAE.

As Shiv said, your torque numbers are low simply because the dyno operator (must be a newb) should have started the run at 2000 rpms, not 4000 rpms.
I'd call the place up and ask for a free redyno since you do not have accurate torque numbers.
11 hp gain over a v1.47 car on the 90% settings is what I'd expect.
At 92% settings you should see another 7-8 rwhp.

And since you are in a 93 Octane state, after you do a WOT 2nd to 3rd gear redline datalog at 92%, and if all is fine and you don't have peak boost of over 15 psi you can up the settings even more. If you can go to 93.333% on 93 Octane, you'll see another 15+ rwhp.

On a v2 only car on 93 Octane, with boost peaking at 14.5-15 psi you should see 350-355 rwhp on the dynojet.
For reference: I got 345 rwhp on 92 Octane with settings that gave me 14.1 psi peak boost.
Appreciate 0
      02-07-2008, 06:15 AM   #17
Driver72
Brigadier General
330
Rep
4,484
Posts

Drives: 335i - to new owners now.
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: California

iTrader: (0)

As for exhaust and drop in filter:

Don't expect more than 3-4 hp, at best, from the drop in filter.
Honestly, it's a very minor amount anyway and when you hear people say, "I noticed a bit more snappy acceleration, quicker throttle response, and bit louder turbo sound" IT'S ALL IN THEIR HEAD!!

On the exhaust side, here's what I've seemed to notice:
On a stock car, or a car making less boost, the catback exhaust seem to give you a good 12-15 rwhp increase.
However, with a tune that pushes power up close to 350 rwhp, the exhaust seems to only give about 6-8 rwhp. Why?
Well at the 360 rwhp point, it's the intake that's the restriction.
The stock exhaust seems to flow well enough to allow 360 rwhp, but the the intake does not. So the car gets choked off by the stock airbox assembly right around the 355-360 rwhp point, regardless of the exhaust you have on.

Meaning, you can make 365+ rwhp with a CAI and stock exhaust. However, in appears you can't make 365+ rwhp with the stock intake and catback exhaust.

So, if you are going to run PROcede v2 on 93 Octane with boost of 14.5-15 psi expect ~350 rwhp.
With exhaust and drop in filter, expect ~360 rwhp.
If you want 365+ rwhp you need to get a good TRUE Cold Air Intake on there too. The twin open air cone filters, as I've said since the day I saw them, will do fine on the dyno, but will suck in an AWEFUL lot of hot air once your hood is down, and the engine is hot.
Appreciate 0
      02-07-2008, 06:18 AM   #18
Driver72
Brigadier General
330
Rep
4,484
Posts

Drives: 335i - to new owners now.
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: California

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lane View Post
I don't know if you are right here. Mr. 5 posted the 35whp was because of the custom tune. Not because of changing the settings. Perhaps he just did not tell about changing the settings, since the graphs indicate clearly more boost indicating the settings to have been changed. How much can you change the settings up running 91oct? Did you increase it to 92% or more? What was the effect of changing the settings and how much of the gain is from the custom tune?
I think Mr. 5 was on 91 Octane too, along with his High Flow Catted DP tune.
I'd expect a bit more if he was on 93 Octane.
Appreciate 0
      02-07-2008, 09:48 AM   #19
MisterBMW
Private First Class
7
Rep
167
Posts

Drives: BMW
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Asia

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by shiv@vishnu View Post
He's running v2 at 90% which means that peak hp is only 10-15whp higher than v1.47 (of course the power differential at high rpm is bigger). Adjusting the user tq settings, depending on octane, can easily be worth another 20whp. Sometimes more. In Mr 5's car, for instance, it was worth 35whp on 91oct. Also, he posted SAE corrected numbers. Both uncorrected and STD would be higher.

Shiv
We re pretty lucky to get 98octane in many parts of Asia. How far can we go for the the torque setting???
Appreciate 0
      02-07-2008, 09:57 AM   #20
e90AW335i
Major General
United_States
138
Rep
6,608
Posts

Drives: e90 335i
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: ......

iTrader: (4)

Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterBMW View Post
We re pretty lucky to get 98octane in many parts of Asia. How far can we go for the the torque setting???
98% or 99%. Seems as if shiv has stated about 1 percentage point above the actual octane is fine.

92% for 91, 94% for 93, etc....
__________________
I install all tunes, intakes, o2 simms, and most cosmetic mods. PM me for a quote.
Appreciate 0
      02-07-2008, 10:02 AM   #21
uhcoug2011
Uhcoug2011
uhcoug2011's Avatar
United_States
37
Rep
757
Posts

Drives: 2007 335i Sedan
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Houston, TX

iTrader: (6)

Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterBMW View Post
We re pretty lucky to get 98octane in many parts of Asia. How far can we go for the the torque setting???
I would say 95-96% to be on the safe side...seeing as that with 100 octane you could probably go 100%
__________________
Sparkling Graphite E90 / JUICEBOX 3 / BMS DUAL CONE FILTERS
Appreciate 0
      02-07-2008, 10:10 AM   #22
michsu
Second Lieutenant
michsu's Avatar
9
Rep
280
Posts

Drives: 2008 335i e90
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Los Angeles

iTrader: (0)

is that true about the air intake, Driver72? So I should install my air intake (got the MSDS Stage 1 and 2) first, and then install the downpipes? Since I have the catback exhaust already, you say the "limit" is because of the stock intake.. Thanks
Appreciate 0
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:18 AM.




e90post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST