|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
JB4 tune or Custom tune for Port Injection
|
|
08-09-2017, 03:11 PM | #1 |
Lieutenant Colonel
659
Rep 1,525
Posts |
JB4 tune or Custom tune for Port Injection
I have an N55 with Pure 2, PI, and all of the proper supporting hardware.
For guys that have port injection and have first gone with a JB4 port injection BEF and JB4 PI Controller, then ditched the JB4 and gone with a flash type PI tune and flash PI Controller. Is the flash tune smoother. better, safer...? Comments welcome as I am at a crossroads with this. May go all out MHD. For the guy that needs to set me straight and tell me to ask it on the N55 side of the house, thanks, but no thanks. I feel that I'd more likely find someone here that has done this, and can comment on the results. |
08-09-2017, 10:31 PM | #2 |
General of the Armies
156
Rep 657
Posts |
The question you are asking is more complex than you might think. First off you asked in the N54 section, so you're going to get an N54 response. But be warned, before reading this...the flash capabilities between the N54 and N55 aren't the same and I am not familiar with the N55 flash limitations.
From an N54 perspective the real issue with PI is safety. When the DME senses a misfire it cuts fuel to that cylinder. The fuel cut is accomplished via disabling the DI injector. The problem with PI is that it is being triggered by boost and RPM. This is the same for flash or for JB4. It (the PI system) has no clue a misfire occurred and the DI injector is disabled. What you have in this instance is a situation where more than 1/2 the expected fuel in this problematic cylinder has just been removed, yielding a dangerously lean environment. Now what happens if you get pre-ignition (i.e. detonation)? Kaboom is right. You'll be in an extremely lean environment during that pre-ignition and will experience extremely high in cylinder temps and pressures that could melt or crack a ringland...which could also bend a rod due to the pressure spike. Most people don't try and "power through" misfires so bad the DME is cutting fuel, but if you did this is the situation you'd find yourself in. With all that said which is better, flash only or JB4? It's effectively a tossup. Terry has said he could update the firmware to detect the misfire code via CAN and have it trigger the PI to stop, but as of yet that feature doesn't exist. So while the JB4's safety systems are always one of its top selling points this particular safety hasn't been coded and released yet. So it really doesn't matter. But, all that's from an N54 perspective. I'm not sure if there are flash only limitations in the N55 world that would drive you to the JB4 instead. ETA: I've had 3 N54's and have used COBB, Procede, JB4 and MHD and done combo's with BEF's and Piggy backs. Each have their selling points, and their drawbacks. Last edited by dyezak; 08-09-2017 at 10:36 PM.. |
Appreciate
1
Kevin39164.00 |
08-10-2017, 10:34 AM | #3 |
Lieutenant Colonel
659
Rep 1,525
Posts |
My current setup uses JB4 and MHD, with a custom BEF made by MHD. Am considering going with flash as I have read that it has smoother power delivery. Thank you for the write-up dyezak. Great info.
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-10-2017, 11:11 AM | #4 | |
Colonel
1213
Rep 2,028
Posts |
Quote:
A "BEF" is a flash tune and there is no such thing as a "flash tune made by MHD." MHD is just an app used to load a file onto the cars computer. Wedge Tuning wrote the N54 off-the-shelf tunes that are sold through the MHD app and BMS wrote the off-the-shelf tunes (BACK END FLASHES) that are written specifically for use with JB4 and are free for use on N54tech. The problem is, neither of these options are "custom." They are simply generic tunes that are meant to work on all cars. Therefore, a "custom" tune written specifically for your car and mods is generally "smoother." Even a generic tune (or "BEF") will be massively smoother than a JB4 only setup. You use JB4 to control your port injection which is the only reason why a "custom" flash tune for your car would be referred to as a "back-end-flash." BMS just made up some stupid acronym so the masses wouldn't realize that the JB4 piggy back device has limitations to what it can "tune" once you start getting more aggressive with it. If you already have a custom "BEF," [a flash tune written specifically for your car] there won't be any "gains" by eliminating the JB4 device from your setup. Your question should read "Is there any advantage to ditching JB4 as a port injection controller and using something else?" I personally would say yes because people have had tons of problems with the JB4 firmware. The hardware itself is failure prone and so is Terry's programming. The efforts made by BMS are noble, and lots of hard work goes into making JB4 work. I don't mean to take away from that, but the project itself has ballooned into something way more than what is really should be. Last edited by bbnks2; 08-10-2017 at 12:13 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
1
CarAbuser475.00 |
08-10-2017, 11:58 AM | #5 | ||
Joint Chiefs of Staff
4927
Rep 116,037
Posts |
There is just so much more you can do with a JB4 in the mix not just relating to PI. If money is no object best bet is to have the JB4 setup and then have a custom flash tuner custom tune your back and flash and boost targets as needed.
From the JB4 PI FAQ: Quote:
Quote:
|
||
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|