11-27-2008, 02:13 PM | #1 |
Scout
3
Rep 41
Posts
Drives: 2007 E92 MT
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Vegas
|
New EPA Fuel Economy Comparisons
Direct from the EPA's new website. All vehicles are manual transmission.
|
12-08-2008, 07:34 AM | #4 |
Lieutenant General
1245
Rep 12,446
Posts |
Does it really? It's heavier and it's got a bigger engine. I mean, the engine itself might be more efficient, but that doesn't mean the car itself will earn better mileage as a result.
The S5 doesn't surprise me. However, it'll receive the new TFSi V6 soon so those numbers should improve.
__________________
Past: '08 E92 335i|ZPP|ZSP|6AT
Past: '15 Mustang GT|401A|PP|6MT Current: '20 Shelby GT350|6MT |
Appreciate
0
|
12-08-2008, 04:56 PM | #5 | |
Major
65
Rep 1,417
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-08-2008, 05:09 PM | #6 |
Banned
795
Rep 4,643
Posts |
i think what seems to be missing from this discussion is the fact that most of us E9x M3 owners (and i'm sure S5 drivers can echo the same sentiment) don't really care about fuel economy. we bought the car knowing it's a hog. i average about 13.4 mpg in my M3 based on my driving style. personally, i never let fuel economy get in the way of a buying decision. i enjoy driving powerful cars and that's what matters to me. if i wanted something economical, i'd buy a hybrid
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-08-2008, 05:37 PM | #7 |
Major
99
Rep 1,209
Posts |
Enjoy them why they last.
In two years all the cars listed will be gone, or will have a lot smaller motors. Consumers no longer want small cars that get worse gas mileage than most SUVs.
__________________
2011 535i
2008 VW GTI |
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|