[-=Hot|Ice=-]

Ward's Auto has released its annual list of Ten Best Engines for the new year, and our first assessment is that it's just as interesting for what isn't present as for what is. First of all, let's get the official list out of the way:

* Audi AG: 2.0L TFSI turbocharged DOHC I-4 (A4 Avant)
* BMW AG: 3.0L turbocharged DOHC I-6 (135i Coupe)
* BMW AG: 3.0L DOHC I-6 Turbodiesel (335d)
* Chrysler LLC: 5.7L Hemi OHV V-8 (Dodge Ram/Challenger R/T)
* Ford Motor Co.: 2.5L DOHC I-4 HEV (Escape Hybrid)
* General Motors Corp.: 3.6L DOHC V-6 (Cadillac CTS)
* Honda Motor Co. Ltd.: 3.5L SOHC V-6 (Accord Coupe)
* Hyundai Motor Co. Ltd.: 4.6L DOHC V-8 (Genesis)
* Toyota Motor Corp.: 3.5L DOHC V-6 (Lexus IS 350)
* Volkswagen AG: 2.0L SOHC I-4 Turbodiesel (Jetta TDI)


Take a good look. Nissan's ubiquitous VQ, which up to this point, was the only engine series that had made Ward's Ten Best ever since the list's inception in 1995, is conspicuously absent. That's a big deal. We also note a couple of turbodiesel engines, one in BMW's favored inline-six configuration and one that powers VW's Jetta TDI. Ford's updated 2.5L hybrid four cylinder is also recognized, rounding out this year's trio of green powerplants. We also note that there's only one American V8 engine, the redesigned HEMI from Chrysler. More snubs? How'd they miss the amazing powerplants that sit under the hoods of the Corvette ZR1 and the Nissan GT-R?

http://www.autoblog.com/2008/12/07/w...gines-of-2009/

[woody2223]

Heeeellllllll Yea! N54 does it again with the 135i

[Motor She Wrote]

Originally Posted by woody2223

Heeeellllllll Yea! N54 does it again with the 135i

Not too many surprises there. I understand leaving the VQ off... looks like Ward's wanted to make a "green" statement by including two diesels and a hybrid, so I guess the VQ gets the axe. Maybe this will be the impetus for Nissan to come up with something better for the Z.

[mikeokimster]

Times are definately of change especially when Hyundai has joined the list

[JunkStory]

Looks like Ward's Auto doesn't want to be suspicious of being biased to Nissan, so they remove the VQ this year.

I can tell you one thing - the Honda SOHC engine should not belong there. DOHC (dual camshaft) engines are always better than SOHC (single camshaft) engines, which are slow and torqueless. I don't know why Honda keeps making them, and I don't know why it made onto the list. Why Ward's Auto, why????

[Jason]

Ward’s Announces 2009 10 Best Engines Winners

By Ward’s Staff
WardsAuto.com, Dec 5, 2008 12:54 PM

SOUTHFIELD, MI – Amid plummeting vehicle sales, thousands of job losses, an economy officially in recession and pleas for federal assistance, a handful of auto makers have cause to celebrate.

Ward’s Automotive Group announces its 2009 10 Best Engines list, which reflects the diversity of powertrains that will play a role in reshaping America’s automotive landscape.

Selected by Ward’s editors, the 2009 list marks the 15th year for the Ward’s 10 Best Engines program, the North American auto industry’s only awards honoring powertrain excellence and considered by many to be the “Oscars” for automotive engines.

The winners for 2008 (engine and tested vehicle):

• Audi AG: 2.0L TFSI turbocharged DOHC I-4 (A4 Avant)
• BMW AG: 3.0L turbocharged DOHC I-6 (335i / 135i Coupe)
• BMW AG: 3.0L DOHC I-6 Turbodiesel (335d)
• Chrysler LLC: 5.7L Hemi OHV V-8 (Dodge Ram/Challenger R/T)
• Ford Motor Co.: 2.5L DOHC I-4 HEV (Escape Hybrid)
• General Motors Corp.: 3.6L DOHC V-6 (Cadillac CTS)
• Honda Motor Co. Ltd.: 3.5L SOHC V-6 (Accord Coupe)
• Hyundai Motor Co. Ltd.: 4.6L DOHC V-8 (Genesis)
• Toyota Motor Corp.: 3.5L DOHC V-6 (Lexus IS 350)
• Volkswagen AG: 2.0L SOHC I-4 Turbodiesel (Jetta TDI)

“A decade ago, few consumers in the U.S. paid serious attention to hybrids or diesels. This year, they have to, if they don’t want to be pinched the next time fuel hits $4 a gallon,” says Tom Murphy, executive editor of Ward’s AutoWorld magazine.”The diesels from VW and BMW and the Ford Escape Hybrid all got better than 30 mpg (7.8 L/100 km) during our testing, and often they topped 40 mpg (5.8 L/100 km),” he says. “And the diesels meet the strictest emissions regulations in the world. If Americans want to find a vehicle that consumes less fuel and is fun to drive, our list is a great place to start.”

Among the winners is Ford Motor Co.’s redesigned 2.5L 4-cyl. hybrid-electric powertrain, which motivated President and CEO Alan Mulally’s Escape Hybrid cross/utility vehicle to and from Washington D.C. for federal-aid talks, makes the cut.

During Ward’s testing, the front-wheel-drive HEV managed to easily surpass the federal fuel-economy rating of 34/31 city/highway mpg (6.9-7.5 L/100 km).

BMW AG’s new 3.0L inline 6-cyl. turbodiesel scores a slot on the list in its first year available in the U.S. Joined by the auto maker’s twin-turbocharged and direct-injected gasoline I-6 engine, which returns for the third year, the diesel employs a sequential twin-turbocharger system that provides the 335d sedan with impressive fuel economy and a stunning 425 lb.-ft. (576 Nm) of torque.

Volkswagen AG joins the clean-diesel party this year, as well, with its new 2.0L 4-cyl. turbodiesel powering the Jetta TDI sedan. Fun to drive and frugal at the pump, the TDI is an affordable and entertaining alternative to many larger gasoline and hybrid-electric powertrains.

Hyundai Motor Co. Ltd. appears for the first time on Ward’s 10 Best Engines list with its all-new Tau 4.6L DOHC V-8. Introduced in the new Genesis luxury sedan, the engine’s velvety power delivery, competitive performance and attainable price epitomize the Korean auto maker’s drive for world-class engineering.

Chrysler LLC’s venerable 5.7L Hemi V-8 returns to the rankings with added refinement, power and variable-valvetrain and induction technology. Its guttural roar and low-end grunt serves double duty this year in the all-new Dodge Challenger R/T and Ram pickup.

Toyota Motor Corp. scores its fourth consecutive 10 Best Engines win with its Lexus 3.5L DOHC V-6, a brilliant design that employs a unique, combination direct- and port-injection fueling system that helps generate 306 hp and 277 lb.-ft. (376 Nm) of torque.

General Motors Corp. and Honda Motor Co. Ltd. also make return appearances with their high-volume V-6 engines exemplifying practicality balanced with precision engineering.

GM’s high-feature 3.6L V-6 with direct-gasoline injection returns for the second time. Tested in the Cadillac CTS, yet flexible enough to proliferate through the auto maker’s CUVs, the advanced V-6 makes a hardy 304 hp on regular gasoline.

Honda underscores its longstanding reputation for great engines with the encore performance of its 3.5L SOHC V-6 in the Accord lineup. Merging exceptional performance with reasonable fuel economy, the engine employs advanced cylinder deactivation in the sedan and engaging power delivery in the coupe.

Audi AG’s 2.0L TFSI turbocharged 4-cyl., freshly revamped with 211 hp and a mighty 258 lb.-ft. (350 Nm) of torque for the all-new A4, rounds out the list with a fourth-consecutive 10 Best Engines placing as one of the best all-around turbo-4s on the market.

This year, six Ward’s editors nominated 32 different engines for the Ward’s 10 Best Engines competition. The nominee list consists of the 2008 winners as well as all-new or significantly improved engines.

Over a nearly 2-month period, the editors evaluated and scored each engine against all others in a number of objective and subjective parameters. Each engine must be available in a regular-production U.S.-specification model on sale no later than first-quarter 2009, in a vehicle priced no more than $54,000, a price cap indexed to the average cost of a new vehicle.

The awards will be given at a Jan. 14 ceremony in Detroit during the North American International Auto Show.

Complete stories about the 10 Best Engines will be featured soon on WardsAuto.com and in upcoming issues of Ward’s AutoWorld magazine and Ward’s Engine & Vehicle Technology Update newsletter.

Ward's 10 Best Engines is a copyright of Penton Media Inc. Commercial references to the program and/or awards are prohibited without prior permission of Ward's Automotive Group.

[e92leon]

FORSURE!

[PaulBailey@ltbmw]

Damn that Genesis!

[ChrisFastM3]

Where's the new M3's glorious V8..... or the M5's beast of a V10? There must have been a mistake here...........

[BMWPower06]

Haha I NEVER took Wards seriously, I mean come on, when u have engines like these:

Chrysler LLC: 5.7L Hemi OHV V-8 (Dodge Ram/Challenger R/T)
General Motors Corp.: 3.6L DOHC V-6 (Cadillac CTS)
Hyundai Motor Co. Ltd.: 4.6L DOHC V-8 (Genesis)

on the list...Thats just stupid. No ///M V8? No ///M V10? No 3.6L Porsche Flat-6? No 4.3L Ferrari V8?

Instead you have the HYUNDAI GENESIS MOTOR? ARE YOU KIDDING ME? or the lazy CTS V-6?

Can't wait for the Engine of the Year awards, they actually know what they are talking about.

[marty_mcfly]

Originally Posted by BMWPower06

Haha I NEVER took Wards seriously, I mean come on, when u have engines like these:

Chrysler LLC: 5.7L Hemi OHV V-8 (Dodge Ram/Challenger R/T)
General Motors Corp.: 3.6L DOHC V-6 (Cadillac CTS)
Hyundai Motor Co. Ltd.: 4.6L DOHC V-8 (Genesis)

on the list...Thats just stupid. No ///M V8? No ///M V10? No 3.6L Porsche Flat-6? No 4.3L Ferrari V8?

Instead you have the HYUNDAI GENESIS MOTOR? ARE YOU KIDDING ME? or the lazy CTS V-6?

Can't wait for the Engine of the Year awards, they actually know what they are talking about.

[BMWPower06]

"Chrysler LLC’s venerable 5.7L Hemi V-8 returns to the rankings with added refinement, power and variable-valvetrain and induction technology. Its guttural roar and low-end grunt serves double duty this year in the all-new Dodge Challenger R/T and Ram pickup."

hahahaha wow, im sorry, but wow, what exactly did they finally add to this old school engine? Direct Fuel Injection? This thing still has only a Single camshaft and 2 valves per cylinder

[mikey19]

i think they only take engines from cars less than $54000

[Year's_End]

Originally Posted by BMWPower06

Haha I NEVER took Wards seriously, I mean come on, when u have engines like these:

Chrysler LLC: 5.7L Hemi OHV V-8 (Dodge Ram/Challenger R/T)
General Motors Corp.: 3.6L DOHC V-6 (Cadillac CTS)
Hyundai Motor Co. Ltd.: 4.6L DOHC V-8 (Genesis)

on the list...Thats just stupid. No ///M V8? No ///M V10? No 3.6L Porsche Flat-6? No 4.3L Ferrari V8?

Instead you have the HYUNDAI GENESIS MOTOR? ARE YOU KIDDING ME? or the lazy CTS V-6?

Can't wait for the Engine of the Year awards, they actually know what they are talking about.

+1

[wmb]

Originally Posted by BMWPower06

Haha I NEVER took Wards seriously, I mean come on, when u have engines like these:

Chrysler LLC: 5.7L Hemi OHV V-8 (Dodge Ram/Challenger R/T)
General Motors Corp.: 3.6L DOHC V-6 (Cadillac CTS)
Hyundai Motor Co. Ltd.: 4.6L DOHC V-8 (Genesis)

on the list...Thats just stupid. No ///M V8? No ///M V10? No 3.6L Porsche Flat-6? No 4.3L Ferrari V8?

Instead you have the HYUNDAI GENESIS MOTOR? ARE YOU KIDDING ME? or the lazy CTS V-6?

Can't wait for the Engine of the Year awards, they actually know what they are talking about.

Yeah Ward's auto-awards have always been a joke. Now the International engines of the year awards — that's a whole different league all-together.

[Big Windy]

Escape Hybrid!

[Motor She Wrote]

Originally Posted by mikey19

i think they only take engines from cars less than $54000

This is correct. Otherwise you would have Ferrari's V8 and V12, etc. That's why the V10 from the M5 didn't make it.

[fijigabe0]

Originally Posted by BMWPower06

"Chrysler LLC’s venerable 5.7L Hemi V-8 returns to the rankings with added refinement, power and variable-valvetrain and induction technology. Its guttural roar and low-end grunt serves double duty this year in the all-new Dodge Challenger R/T and Ram pickup."

hahahaha wow, im sorry, but wow, what exactly did they finally add to this old school engine? Direct Fuel Injection? This thing still has only a Single camshaft and 2 valves per cylinder

There's a reason why the HEMI is on the list. from the old engine, they were able to squeeze another 30hp out of it, while still making it liveable. additionally, Chrysler was able to engineer variable valve timing to the engine. yeah, an OHV engine with Variable Valve Timing AND cylinder deactivation. who cares that it only has two valves? does it get the job done? yeah, it does.

in the Challenger, at least, this combo is good enough for 375hp, 16mpg city/25mpg highway. and pretty decent handling, given the IRS taken from the E-Class.

[schnell330i]

yeah i like the International Eninge of the Year Awards much better:
http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/07/2...rds-announced/

http://www.ukipme.com/engineoftheyear/

Originally Posted by BMWPower06

Haha I NEVER took Wards seriously, I mean come on, when u have engines like these:

Chrysler LLC: 5.7L Hemi OHV V-8 (Dodge Ram/Challenger R/T)
General Motors Corp.: 3.6L DOHC V-6 (Cadillac CTS)
Hyundai Motor Co. Ltd.: 4.6L DOHC V-8 (Genesis)

on the list...Thats just stupid. No ///M V8? No ///M V10? No 3.6L Porsche Flat-6? No 4.3L Ferrari V8?

Instead you have the HYUNDAI GENESIS MOTOR? ARE YOU KIDDING ME? or the lazy CTS V-6?

Can't wait for the Engine of the Year awards, they actually know what they are talking about.

[BMWPower06]

Originally Posted by fijigabe0

There's a reason why the HEMI is on the list. from the old engine, they were able to squeeze another 30hp out of it, while still making it liveable. additionally, Chrysler was able to engineer variable valve timing to the engine. yeah, an OHV engine with Variable Valve Timing AND cylinder deactivation. who cares that it only has two valves? does it get the job done? yeah, it does.

in the Challenger, at least, this combo is good enough for 375hp, 16mpg city/25mpg highway. and pretty decent handling, given the IRS taken from the E-Class.

How is anything u listed a marvel of modern engineering? Cylinder deactivation is not something hard to incorporate into an engine. OHV engines have nearly become extinct for a reason...

The ///M V10 and V8 are marvels of modern engineering. The ///M V10 has a 12:1 Compression ratio (WOW), 100hp/L (all NA), 8250rpm Redline (an OHV engine, could only dream to rev this high), double vanos, individual throttle bodies/cylinder, I could go on for days.

As for only being for cars under $54K then thats just useless. Making high technology, highly advanced engines costs money, hence you see the list of garbage that made the list on wards.

[BoostedBMW]

Eh, I'll take that N54 award with a grain of salt since they also gave an award to a 5.7L hemi.

[Deda]

love that 35d engine!