12-30-2009, 05:24 PM | #1 |
Private First Class
43
Rep 123
Posts |
MHP S2 C63 Burnout Vid, New Dynos with Race Catback
For those interested in what the C63 guys are up to:
Our S2 car (93 octane): SAE: 477/442rw Actual: 501/464w Keith's S3 car (93 octane): SAE: 488/448rw Actual: 520/478rw 3" Catback: S2 Burnout: Last edited by MHP; 12-30-2009 at 05:46 PM.. |
12-30-2009, 09:58 PM | #2 |
Colonel
286
Rep 2,007
Posts |
Sick numbers. Is that just with free-flow exhaust and chip? Maybe pulleys too?
I feel bad for those tires.
__________________
(Waitlist): #1 M2CSL
(Current): 2016 F15 X5 3.5xdrive - 2010 997.2 C4S Coupe (Past): 2016 F30 340xi M-Sport -2013 535i xdrive 2008 E92 M3 - 2006 E90 325i 2002 E46 325xi - 1991 E30 325i |
Appreciate
0
|
12-30-2009, 10:56 PM | #3 | |
Private First Class
43
Rep 123
Posts |
Quote:
First set of graphs are from our S2 car: LTs/Mids, Catback, Tuning, Airbox/Filters, Thermostat. Second set has our race ported heads in addition to the above. The first three cammed 63s will be running around in a few weeks. Goal is 540rw+ SAE N/A. Stock cams only have around 200 degrees of duration @ .050, basically on par with a Ford Modular 4.6L cam. Which is probably the only way AMG got this motor to pass emissions. They also have zero overlap so we're really not even taking advantage of the LTs yet. Then we stroke, re-cam and re-port. Fun stuff. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-31-2009, 05:02 AM | #5 |
Private First Class
43
Rep 123
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-31-2009, 03:06 PM | #7 |
Private First Class
43
Rep 123
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-31-2009, 10:40 PM | #9 |
Second Lieutenant
37
Rep 252
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-01-2010, 04:23 AM | #10 | |
Private First Class
43
Rep 123
Posts |
Quote:
We don't believe in UD pulleys. Crank dampers are meant to quell internal harmonics, and a 6.2L v8 revving to 7500rpm (post H/C) will need every bit of a 6.62" shell dia to safely eliminate all 3rd order harmonics. V8s have more 3rd order vibration than V6s, V10s, V12s. Long story short, a damper is not a place to make power, it's cheap insurance for a $40K bottom end. All our dampers are made by ATI and are SAE certified for use up to 750HP/7500rpm. They may not make power, but they don't lose any despite the larger shell due to the complete elimination of crank flex. Ah my bad. You are correct, cheap stuff. Nothing like my M5. Thanks!h |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-04-2010, 03:31 AM | #13 |
Private First Class
43
Rep 123
Posts |
I would do the same especially since the ~30hp gain apparently now comes from the tune alone vs a forged M159 bottom end as well. Skip the Vmax limiter but get the LSD, we can eliminate Vmax with a tune.
Thank you sir! |
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|