|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
JB4 map 1
|
|
06-12-2011, 01:01 PM | #2 |
ايلي ٣٣٥ هاهاها
88
Rep 1,448
Posts |
most likely 315whp to 330 whp
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-12-2011, 03:57 PM | #4 |
ايلي ٣٣٥ هاهاها
88
Rep 1,448
Posts |
seriously? 335i stock is 280 whp. map 1 on JB4 is 13 psi meanwhile stock psi IS 7.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-12-2011, 04:51 PM | #5 | |
Agent Smith
270
Rep 3,344
Posts
Drives: 2016 i8
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: The Matrix
|
Quote:
I agree - no way. JB4 Map 1 should be getting you around 340 pretty easily. I've seen a JB4 Map 1 dyno of 345hp.
__________________
The i8 needs a V8 amirite?
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-13-2011, 05:44 PM | #6 | |
Banned
2
Rep 43
Posts |
Quote:
Hooked on Phonics Learn to Read......nub Now your gonna jump in here and throw dyno numbers out there.... with your ZERO credibility on this FOURM .were you dropped on your head as a child or what! please give us some excuse for your lack of basic Knowledge,Struck by lightning something!!!!! Don't go away mad, just go away.... |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-13-2011, 06:00 PM | #8 | |
Second Lieutenant
13
Rep 202
Posts |
Quote:
Our cars stock dyno between 270-280 so how would it makes sense that raising boost from 8psi to 13psi which is what map 1 does give you only 10 rwhp. I would say 315-330 (conservatively) sounds about right depending on mods and condition. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-13-2011, 08:21 PM | #9 |
Banned
47
Rep 631
Posts |
Car dyno's 267whp stock... I've seen many users with COBB 91 octane dyno and it runs 305WHP. I've raced my friends JB4 map 1 when I had COBB and I pulled slightly.
COBB 93 octane dynos at 320WHP. I've raced my friends JB4 map 2 and pulled when we got to 140 I'm not bullshitting numbers.. JB4 map1 gives you about 40whp over stock |
Appreciate
0
|
06-13-2011, 08:22 PM | #10 |
Banned
47
Rep 631
Posts |
Its a wonderful tune! I'm not bashing it, I'm just pointing out real life!
COBB 93 octane won't even hit 345whp and it will pull on JB4 map 2 slightly.. I'm switching to JB4 myself, I've already sold COBB |
Appreciate
0
|
06-13-2011, 09:11 PM | #11 |
Second Lieutenant
13
Rep 202
Posts |
267 stock is on the low end. Most people in the US on average have dyno'd stock between 270-280 (I remember one a long time ago around 290). With JB3 they hit the 315-330 mark no problem. I'm not saying your bullshitting numbers but what we have seen on the boards from posted dyno's are much higher numbers than that.
As far as your friend we would need more info because there are more things that can influence you pulling on him slightly than just the tune. Like At vs. MT, coupe vs. sedan, octane, weather, etc. Not saying you didn't pull on him. You can't compare Cobb 93 octane to JB4 map 1 91 octane. People with JB4 map 1 with 91 octane have beat Cobb 91 octane majority of the time. If your comparing the Cobb 93 octane map then you would have to compare it to JB4 map 2. There is a post (search for it) that compares the JB and Cobb maps that was posted when Cobb came out. You may be pointing out your real life but that doesn't negate all the real life dyno's and posts we have had previously showing things differently. Other than your own experience where else did you see a Cobb 93 octane pull on JB4 map2? I'm asking because on the boards we have seen the opposite. JB4 map 2 with 93 octane will pull on Cobb 93 octane. Why are you switching if it worked so well, especially if according to your numbers Cobb gives you more hp and is faster? Just asking, not trying to start anything. Last edited by rmdvrs; 06-13-2011 at 09:39 PM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
06-13-2011, 09:20 PM | #12 | |||
Agent Smith
270
Rep 3,344
Posts
Drives: 2016 i8
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: The Matrix
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
The i8 needs a V8 amirite?
|
|||
Appreciate
0
|
06-13-2011, 09:49 PM | #13 | ||
Second Lieutenant
13
Rep 202
Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
That's what I wanted to know. If that is true then you can't compare. Even with 94 octane running the Cobb 93 octane map and the other car running 91 octane, no supporting mods and timing being pulled and the car knocking he was only able to pull on him a little. What does that tell you. Maybe things are different in Calgary Last edited by rmdvrs; 06-13-2011 at 10:16 PM.. |
||
Appreciate
0
|
06-13-2011, 09:54 PM | #14 | |
Agent Smith
270
Rep 3,344
Posts
Drives: 2016 i8
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: The Matrix
|
Quote:
__________________
The i8 needs a V8 amirite?
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-13-2011, 10:05 PM | #16 | |
Second Lieutenant
13
Rep 202
Posts |
Quote:
Yeah either way not a mere 40 over stock and 290/320. People wouldn't spend the kind of money they do on piggybacks if that's all they gained. At those levels and price (especially back when they first came out) Dinan would be a better option then since it also gives you a warranty. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-13-2011, 10:13 PM | #17 | |
Second Lieutenant
13
Rep 202
Posts |
Quote:
Otherwise you have to compare maps, octane, mods, etc. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-13-2011, 10:47 PM | #18 | |
Banned
56
Rep 1,063
Posts |
Quote:
So if the JB4 cars are putting down better numbers, why are people letting Cobb get away with charging double for less power? |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-13-2011, 10:52 PM | #19 | |
Banned
6
Rep 348
Posts |
Quote:
LOL Do some research. Its how they tune thats different. Power is nothing without control. How does BMW get away with charge $45K for a car with 300 HP when you can buy a 370z with 330 HP for less money.... Sounds like a dumb question right? |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-13-2011, 11:00 PM | #20 |
This is it!!
16
Rep 672
Posts |
My stock is 270 and with Procede, intake, DP, FMIC, Intake, Charge pipe, Cyba scoop, i was around 380-390 depend on the weather condition. The east seem to produce higher number than in TX and Cali. Just a tune only for both Cobb and JB4, i would think they run about 310-320 depends on the weather and location?
__________________
DFW, TX. Current: 08' Cayenne GTS, 14' Boxster S, 12' CBR 1000', 04' Bayliner 2556
Sold: 2010 A4, 2008 335i, 2007 335i, 2006 M3, 2006 S2000, 1990 NSX, 1991 300zx, 1992 Supra, 1996 Prelude, 1981 CRX, 1980 Mustang. |
Appreciate
0
|
06-13-2011, 11:01 PM | #22 |
Random Car Person
25
Rep 481
Posts
Drives: Slow M3
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Calgary, AB
|
My car was the JB4 comparison car - to be fair, my HPFP was dying, and during the runs, my car was bogging very hard between shifts 3->4 on Map 2 (it was still on 94 octane at the time, btw, not 91).
With a new (3rd!) HPFP, and a DCI, on 94 octane, it runs like a charm with zero bogging and decent logs. I also have a meth-kit en-route, which will improve things even more. We would have compared tunes again, but Vader now has bolt-ons, and is changing to JB4, in order to take full advantage of those bolt-ons. Our altitude also makes a difference in numbers -- a dyno day is planned in a couple of weeks, so we will have results of a JB4+Intake+DP+FMIC car vs a JB4+Intake+Meth car. |
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|