|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
Not enough turbo noise!
|
|
01-07-2012, 02:36 PM | #1 |
Second Lieutenant
19
Rep 264
Posts |
Not enough turbo noise!
I love the noise my 335i makes, but would like to be reminded it is turbocharged once in a while!
What is the best route for hearing a bit more spool-up noise, maybe even (dare I say it) a whoosh from the DV? Any particular induction systems etc....? Your opinions appreciated. |
01-07-2012, 02:50 PM | #4 |
Major General
1546
Rep 8,972
Posts |
Open type air filter kits are great for whooshy noise.
BMS DC (dual cone) intake kit is best VFM. try http://www.juiceduptuning.co.uk/shop_intakes.asp Give neil a shout there, good bloke. Last edited by doughboy; 01-07-2012 at 03:00 PM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
01-07-2012, 03:18 PM | #5 |
Banned
247
Rep 7,690
Posts
Drives: 335i SE Coupe Space Grey
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: LONDON
|
I think the Gruppe M intake should give you a nice sound....all I know is that, its bloody expensive!...
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-08-2012, 03:58 AM | #7 | |
Lieutenant
16
Rep 529
Posts |
Quote:
Mike. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-08-2012, 04:20 AM | #8 | |
Colonel
112
Rep 2,621
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
Car: e91 330d with Viezu map
Gone but not forgotten: 2010 Jaguar XFR (Cat-back exhaust, pulley, intake mods and map), Highly Modified E90 335i LCI M Sport Manual (circa 480BHP/500lb ft) |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-08-2012, 01:46 PM | #9 |
Major
53
Rep 1,272
Posts |
Note your standard airbox will be best for performance, but a cone filter will give you the most noise, whilst sooking in warm/hot air and slowing your car down
__________________
Monte Carlo Blue M3 Comp |
Appreciate
0
|
01-08-2012, 02:25 PM | #10 |
Captain
51
Rep 793
Posts |
I agree for an NA car, but it's not really noticeable on a turbo car - an extra couple of degrees at the start is peanuts compared to the heat gained as the air passes through the turbo... The intercooler will knock the temperature back to more or less the same by the time it gets to the cylinder anyway.
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-08-2012, 02:48 PM | #11 |
Major
53
Rep 1,272
Posts |
absolute bollocks.
it's by far more important on a turbocharged car, for the rise in temperature delivered by compressed air. your intercooler wont be 100% efficient...the cooler the air going in, the cooler it will come out the turbo and the cooler it will be going through the IC. as a rule of thumb, 1degree c is equal to 1bhp. Why do you think BMW design cold air feeds on their intake systems if "the intercooler will cool it back down anyway" trust me, I work on a dyno all day, rolling roading, testing intercoolers, turbo's and mapping cars.
__________________
Monte Carlo Blue M3 Comp |
Appreciate
0
|
01-08-2012, 05:10 PM | #12 |
Captain
51
Rep 793
Posts |
How polite. I completely agree that cold dense air is better than hot sparse air, but I don't believe the change from the stock box to a DCI setup is really going to make a noticeable difference to performance purely because of the change in the charge temperature.
What do you reckon the temperature difference is going to be between the stock setup and the DCI once the car is moving? I'd be surprised if it's more than a few degrees given the amount of air passing through the grille into the engine bay. So, supposing 1 degree C makes a 1bhp difference, 1 degree C at the inlet translates to 1 degree C at the cylinder (which seems unlikely) and the stock intake isn't saturated at full load and restricting airflow - that means 5 degree hotter air will make 5bhp less. That's much less than the difference between regular and premium unleaded, for instance, so I don't really think is anything to worry about. Obviously my opinion, take it or leave it (or call it 'absolute bollocks').
__________________
2021 G21 M340i XDrive | ACS springs and spacers
Previously 2019 VW Golf GTI Performance | H&R rear ARB Previously 2007 E92 335i SE auto | Quaife LSD | Birds B3 ARBs | Evolve Stage 1 |
Appreciate
0
|
01-08-2012, 05:16 PM | #13 |
Major
53
Rep 1,272
Posts |
Sorry, I just felt very strongly about you're reply
well having tested a car with std cone and stock airbox, on a mild day the difference was 16c, tested on the rolling road, with a pretty huge fan so say for talking sake it was 10c on the road, thats 10 horses... wether you care about those 10 horses or not, is another matter. the other thing i'd throw into the equation is, cone filters fuck airflow meters - fact, it's the oil they are coated in coupled with poor filtration, IMO a loss of power, and potentially fucked airflow meter just completely rule it out for me.
__________________
Monte Carlo Blue M3 Comp |
Appreciate
0
|
01-08-2012, 05:33 PM | #14 |
Lieutenant
7
Rep 436
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-08-2012, 05:46 PM | #15 |
Major
53
Rep 1,272
Posts |
AVA down beside the airport in Glasgow mate
__________________
Monte Carlo Blue M3 Comp |
Appreciate
0
|
01-08-2012, 05:59 PM | #16 |
Colonel
348
Rep 2,396
Posts |
All jokes aside the loudest thing I did on intake side was Vishnu charge pipe. I had Forge DV, intercooler and intake but the most difference was with the CP.
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-09-2012, 03:02 AM | #17 | |
Major General
1546
Rep 8,972
Posts |
Quote:
I think the theory is right, but it doesn't take into account the fact that with open cones the compressor has work less hard to draw in the air, so there is a lower pressure increase across it, thus the air is heated LESS as it is compressed. I'm sure the US forum has various N54 dyno graphs showing actual manifold air temp being the same or lower with open cones even with higher atmosphere intake temp due to the above. It's also worse on a dyno as the fans only simulate 30mph road speed at max, out on the open road the engine bay is filled with cooler air which no dyno cell fans could ever match. My 335i was quicker at the top end with open cones, it pulled right to 6.5k, picking up at 5.5k where the standard airbox starts to make the car a bit wheezy. PS: Re MAF issues, N54's are not mass air flow contolled, they have no MAF. Last edited by doughboy; 01-09-2012 at 04:16 AM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-09-2012, 03:35 AM | #18 | |
Lieutenant
16
Rep 529
Posts |
Quote:
Bottom line for me is that the DCI costs very little, and makes a lovely noise, to my ears at least. Performance is probably little different from stock airbox in everyday use. Mike. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-09-2012, 04:18 AM | #19 |
Captain
28
Rep 636
Posts |
I have the BMS dual cones and notice the car is more responsive.
Also, the noise sounds a bit like a tornado in the glove box when you push the loud pedal. It will put a smile on your face |
Appreciate
0
|
01-09-2012, 05:41 AM | #21 |
Major
53
Rep 1,272
Posts |
The fan we use is probably nothing like the fan's you regularly see on a rolling road setup, it's probably more close to a 60mph wind simulation!
when testing std airbox against cone filter, the car had the bonnet open, we then fitted a seperate cold air feed enclosing the cone filter and the difference between bonnet up/normal fan on full speed and bonnet up/sepperate cold air feed and RR fan on full the difference was 16bhp.... I realise i'm not going to convince the masses, but having saw the difference with my own eyes having tested hundreds of cars rather than just theorized, I know for sure what works and what doesnt. take the EP3 civic typeR (yes non-turbo but still same theory)...pre-facelift with std airbox car's make 9bhp less than post-facelift cars, and the only difference with the two engine wise is the post-facelift car has a piece of plastic that take a cold air feed from infront of the radiator, whereas the pre-facelift cars suck warmer air from behind the rad. Anyway, I just thought i'd point out my findings with cone filters and why I wouldnt use one over a standard airbox
__________________
Monte Carlo Blue M3 Comp |
Appreciate
0
|
01-09-2012, 05:52 AM | #22 |
Major General
1546
Rep 8,972
Posts |
Fair play mate, I think the gains are minimal if any, but it definitely freed up the top end on my car. I took it off because the noise put me off initially but when I did it felt like a pillow had been stuffed in the intake!
But I've bought a used on of these now, which has a heat shield and still gets a part feed off the standard cold air feed duct. Worth a read http://www.n54tech.com/forums/showth...dci+iat+graphs Re RR fans, the Car Planet Racing DynoDynamics 4WD 1000bhp dyno cell I last used has 2 giant fan modules in front and a full wall of extraction behind (they build and run 1000bhp+ Time Attack Evo's), fans on full was monstrous, almost blew your ear-defenders off and made more noise than the car, but the operator said it was still only equivalent to a 30mph road speed as far as the engine bay was concerned. Last edited by doughboy; 01-09-2012 at 06:12 AM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|