|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
JB4 + RB Turbos -- 7.42 60-130
|
|
10-16-2012, 08:01 AM | #1 |
Joint Chiefs of Staff
4927
Rep 116,037
Posts |
JB4 + RB Turbos -- 7.42 60-130
Hey guys,
Just a follow up to the 513rw dynochart posted last week as there was a lot of interest and good discussion in that thread. In the same trim as the dyno previously posted the car managed back to back 7.42 60-130 times which I think is a N54 twin turbo world record. There was also a couple 1/4 mile tests done launching part throttle in 2nd and the car managed back to back 130mph traps. |
10-16-2012, 08:05 AM | #2 |
Captain
14
Rep 961
Posts |
Nice
__________________
"I'm not surprised you get along well with all the other neighbours. If you put fifty children with Down's syndrome in a room there is going to be a lot of hugging." David Thorne
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-16-2012, 08:08 AM | #3 |
Major General
161
Rep 7,377
Posts |
yep very nice results!
__________________
07 335i AT - MOTIV 750 - MHD E85 BMS flash - BMS PI - JB4G5 - Okada Coils - NGK 5992 Plugs - Helix IC - Snow Stg. 3 - Stett CP - Custom midpipes with 100 HJS Cats - Bastuck Quad - PSS10 - QUAIFE LSD - BMS OCC - Forge DVs - AR OC - ALCON BBK - M3 Chassi - Dinan CP - Velocity M rear Toe arms - Advan RZ-DF - LUX H8 - Level 10 AT upgrade
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-16-2012, 08:15 AM | #4 |
Second Lieutenant
14
Rep 290
Posts |
nice trap speed also
__________________
2008 135i 6-speed current stock for now
1995 e36 M3 5-speed Jb4 G5//CM-FX400//FBO//Meth// 12.06@118 6-speed manual sold summer 2013 |
Appreciate
0
|
10-16-2012, 08:59 AM | #7 |
Major General
178
Rep 6,631
Posts |
Keep in mind BMS 135i weighs in around 3200 lbs without driver. That's 350-400 lbs less than a comparable E90/E92.
Regardless, they are impressive times.
__________________
E90 LCI N54 6AT
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-16-2012, 09:17 AM | #8 | |
Joint Chiefs of Staff
4927
Rep 116,037
Posts |
Quote:
As for weight, I just double checked the numbers and it should be around 143# lighter than a 335 assuming all else is equal according to BMW. The car also has lighter rims, no cats, and the passenger seat out which all save some weight vs. an unmodified car. Then add back in 20# for the full 2.2G meth kit, 200# driver weight, etc. Mike Last edited by Mike@N54Tuning.com; 10-16-2012 at 10:24 AM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-16-2012, 09:54 AM | #9 |
Lieutenant Colonel
78
Rep 1,883
Posts |
Some good runs. That car is fast.
Looks like you found a favorable piece of road.
__________________
Legal Disclaimer: Anything I or anyone else says about my vehicle on this website(e90post.com or any affiliated or nonaffiliated sites), pertaining to modifications, is only to gain acceptance from my/our peers, and does not actually represent anything actually existing on my car, and thus, cannot be held against me in any issues, i.e. warranty claims, that may arise.
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-16-2012, 11:00 AM | #10 |
Joint Chiefs of Staff
4927
Rep 116,037
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-16-2012, 11:24 AM | #11 |
.
829
Rep 3,982
Posts |
That is a very mild street launch, feathering the throttle, and still solidly in the 11's. Reduce the 2.0 to a dragstrip 1.70 launch and you could be looking at a .60 sec reduction in the qtr mile. Additionally, that kind of launch where you are backing off the throttle usually does not equate to the best trap speed period. The 135i does not have aerodynamics in its favor. So 130mph back to back qtr mile runs with a .005 (.5%) slope is pretty strong!
Car already ran a 11.2x at the actual dragstrip with 60 less hp? 0-60 time of 3.0 seconds on stock turbos. So high 10's potential is a given now.
__________________
2011 Alpine 335d M-Sport 12.34 @ 110.48mph
2019 i3s Terra, 2008 Black 335i Sedan. 11.11@ 129.47 mph 2008 Monaco Blue JB3 2.0 335i Coupe. 11.33 @ 132.77 mph, 60-130mph: 6.95 seconds 2023 i4 M50 11.48 @ 121.56mph, 3.43 0-60 (dragy) Last edited by hotrod182; 10-16-2012 at 11:55 AM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
10-16-2012, 11:38 AM | #12 |
First Lieutenant
8
Rep 374
Posts |
Any chance you will bring it to a real drag strip to see what it does? I would love to see another n54 in the 10's...
__________________
2008 335xi AT
Cobb AP stage 1, drop in filter, the rest stock 13.10@106.01 w/ 1.86 60' (5,800' altitude) |
Appreciate
0
|
10-16-2012, 11:41 AM | #13 |
Lieutenant
14
Rep 579
Posts
Drives: 08 AW e92 335i
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: MD/NOVA/DC
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-16-2012, 02:02 PM | #15 | |
Major General
178
Rep 6,631
Posts |
Quote:
My porky 6AT E90 weighs in at 3605! I weigh 180-185 depending on water retention and I think terry is right around there too.
__________________
E90 LCI N54 6AT
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-16-2012, 04:28 PM | #16 | |
Joint Chiefs of Staff
4927
Rep 116,037
Posts |
Quote:
Mike |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-16-2012, 06:34 PM | #18 |
Colonel
112
Rep 2,856
Posts
Drives: 2011 335is E93
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Ontario
|
Looks promising, but that's a high 11 at best in my full weight E93 lol
So jealous.... |
Appreciate
0
|
10-16-2012, 09:26 PM | #19 |
Colonel
134
Rep 2,489
Posts
Drives: 2007 E92 SG 335i 6MT
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: SW Florida
|
Nice video and numbers. I always believe weight reduction to be better than adding hp, but maybe thats because its cheap!
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-17-2012, 01:25 PM | #21 |
Lieutenant General
661
Rep 10,587
Posts |
will have to disagree......once you reach a point that is.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-17-2012, 06:08 PM | #22 |
Colonel
134
Rep 2,489
Posts
Drives: 2007 E92 SG 335i 6MT
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: SW Florida
|
Oh, i was just talking about the obvious things like removing the passenger/rear seats, insulation, sound system, AC, etc. Not that a lot of people do that to these cars though.
But when it comes to rims/cf body panels/light-weight BBKs, i completely agree that its serious $
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|