08-13-2007, 12:49 PM | #1 |
Private First Class
10
Rep 112
Posts |
2006 330ix vs 2004 330i
For those who are interested:
A 2006 330ix with automatic is exactly as slow/fast as a manual 330i 2004 model. From 0 to 170Km/h we where head to head, I don't think the cars deviated more than an inch throughout all of the acceleration. I’m very disappointed… :mad: |
08-13-2007, 02:05 PM | #2 |
Major General
3677
Rep 9,783
Posts |
Why be disappointed? XI's will always have more powertrain losses. In addition to that you have an auto which further lowers the HP & torque advantage you have over the 04 330i. IMO you have a very nice car so just enjoy it.
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-13-2007, 02:32 PM | #3 |
Private First Class
10
Rep 112
Posts |
I do, just that I regret that I chose the XI. Have no use for it, and handling isn't as good as the rwd.
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-13-2007, 06:16 PM | #4 | |
Master of Ceremonies
1
Rep 111
Posts |
Quote:
my xi allows me to create expansive spaces between myself and other cars (behind me) on the road, when raining/snowing. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-14-2007, 06:58 AM | #5 |
Private First Class
10
Rep 112
Posts |
Yea, but also bumps in the road. Feels like the xi takes longer time to settle after hitting a bump or uneven surfaces.
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-14-2007, 01:40 PM | #6 |
Master of Ceremonies
1
Rep 111
Posts |
hmmm...the only difference i've noticed between my awd and my mom's rwd is that the awd seems a bit more firm. it's not the rebound, more like differences in spring rate.
alas, i can't prove shit. all i have are theories. |
Appreciate
0
|
08-14-2007, 03:38 PM | #7 | |
Private First Class
10
Rep 112
Posts |
Quote:
To bad if that makes the cars handling worse... |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|