11-19-2013, 05:21 PM | #1 |
Free Thinker
19911
Rep 7,561
Posts |
Canon 1.4x TC III $425
At Amazon. Best price I've seen. I just grabbed one. After renting one last week I was pretty impressed with its capabilities when matched with the 400 f5.6.
__________________
Last edited by M_Six; 11-19-2013 at 05:26 PM.. |
11-19-2013, 11:25 PM | #4 |
Brigadier General
2613
Rep 3,535
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-19-2013, 11:31 PM | #5 |
Free Thinker
19911
Rep 7,561
Posts |
I'll grab some pics with it on my 70-200 f2.8 IS when I get it later this week. I rented one last week (the 1.4x TC III, that is) and it was far superior on my 400 5.6 to the Kenko 1.4x TC I have.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-21-2013, 02:07 PM | #6 | ||
Second Lieutenant
54
Rep 298
Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
Except my bank account might hate me for this. |
||
Appreciate
0
|
11-21-2013, 02:29 PM | #7 |
Captain
57
Rep 816
Posts |
It pays to keep an eye on the Canon store for deals on refurbs. There was a 20% off coupon a few weeks back. As usual most desirable lenses were quickly out of stock, but the mark III converters were both available for ~$320 w/ free shipping.
Last edited by vachss; 11-21-2013 at 08:10 PM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
11-21-2013, 08:07 PM | #9 |
Captain
57
Rep 816
Posts |
Arrgghh. Head not communicating with fingers. Meant the Canon store (but had just been looking at an ad for the Boeing store). I've fixed the post and included a link to the Canon refurb site (though of course since there's no sale at the moment the prices aren't all that compelling).
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-21-2013, 11:36 PM | #11 |
Chief Senior Executive Managing VP of Orange Sales
600
Rep 2,578
Posts |
I too was wondering about Boeing ... Maybe they figured, hey, get some parts for your 747 and a refurb lens or two while you're at it ...
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-21-2013, 11:41 PM | #12 |
Free Thinker
19911
Rep 7,561
Posts |
Got mine today. Supposed to be cold but clear this weekend, so maybe I'll get down to the lake and see if the eagles will cooperate.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-23-2013, 01:53 PM | #13 |
Free Thinker
19911
Rep 7,561
Posts |
A murder of crows. Not the most exciting or rare birds, but they posed nicely while I was testing out my new 1.4x TC III with taped pins on my 400 5.6 and 6D. The AF is a bit slow and indecisive, but it seems to work. The killer is having to shoot at f8 and 1/640s in less than bright light. The ISO really creeps up and starts to steal detail. This is where IS would be a huge advantage.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-23-2013, 04:21 PM | #14 |
Major General
1299
Rep 7,389
Posts |
The first one is excellent, but the second displays the classic crow image problem, no details in the blacks. You need to expose at like +1EV and raise the black levels in Raw conversion. You might try raising the blacks on this image to see if there are details in there. You can also raise Shadows or do a little of both.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-23-2013, 08:03 PM | #15 |
Free Thinker
19911
Rep 7,561
Posts |
And the first is ISO 8000 as opposed to 1600 on the second. I was more interested in how well the AF worked with the pins taped. It works fine on a sitting bird. If we get some sun tomorrow, I'll try it on the TVs if they're out sailing around.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-02-2013, 04:40 PM | #17 |
Major General
1299
Rep 7,389
Posts |
Depending on the body you're using, you may struggle with it. On the 7D and lesser bodies, you'll need to tape the pins and it'll be slow. On the 5D MkIII, it should work without alteration, but considerably slower then you're used to. On the 1D X, life will be hunky-dory.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-02-2013, 05:21 PM | #18 |
Free Thinker
19911
Rep 7,561
Posts |
I can tell you it won't AF at all on the 7D even with pins taped. At least it doesn't on my 7D. It does AF on the 6D with pins taped, but slowly.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-02-2013, 05:30 PM | #19 |
Major General
1299
Rep 7,389
Posts |
Interesting. It did work on my 7D, with pins taped, but I still wanted to throw it against a tree...
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-02-2013, 05:39 PM | #20 |
Free Thinker
19911
Rep 7,561
Posts |
Maybe I need a better target. I couldn't get it to work, though. And even if it did on a really high contrast target, it'd be useless for most shots where there were trees in the background.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|