|
|
10-01-2015, 11:37 PM | #1 |
Private First Class
21
Rep 164
Posts |
WTB: HFC test pipe or X pipe
Was going to order Turner Catless test pipes but don't want to deal with CEL going on and not being able to pass inspection. So decided to just go with a hfc setup now.
|
10-02-2015, 10:57 AM | #2 |
Captain
436
Rep 856
Posts |
Is this a question? You will most likely not pass inspection with hfc's. There is a slight chance of passing if you use o2 extenders but it seems to be hit or miss. Mostly miss though.
__________________
-- 08 JB e92 6MT ///M3 ESS VT2-625 --
|
Appreciate
1
|
10-05-2015, 12:08 PM | #3 |
Lieutenant Colonel
759
Rep 1,835
Posts
Drives: 2020 X4M CS
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Long Island, NY
|
If you get a proper tune that doesn't look for the rear O2's your car will pass inspection with HFC's or cat-less. Not to mention you will not extract the cars potential doing a cat-delete if the ECU is not tuned for it...
If a HFC is restrictive enough to not set off Check Engine Light, It probably will not result in a significant power increase. my .02
__________________
2020 BSM X4///M-2016 BSM ///M2- 2011 668 ///M3 |
Appreciate
0
|
10-10-2015, 01:09 AM | #5 |
Lieutenant Colonel
759
Rep 1,835
Posts
Drives: 2020 X4M CS
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Long Island, NY
|
Very good choice, secondary cats and resonators are not very restrictive and the tune not ony adds power, but raising redline on a car that makes peak horse power between 7-8500 rpm, makes the car a lot faster than 15 whp seems like it woulds. Let me suggest BPM Sport Tune, driven in M3's with all 3 major flashes. BPM was he easiest to install, and miles ahead of the other 2 in drivability. Just my opinon, let us know what you settle on bro
__________________
2020 BSM X4///M-2016 BSM ///M2- 2011 668 ///M3 |
Appreciate
0
|
10-12-2015, 08:10 PM | #6 | |
Private First Class
21
Rep 164
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|